Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity
- PMID: 15085132
- DOI: 10.1038/nature02447
Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity
Abstract
Contrary to our rich phenomenological visual experience, our visual short-term memory system can maintain representations of only three to four objects at any given moment. For over a century, the capacity of visual memory has been shown to vary substantially across individuals, ranging from 1.5 to about 5 objects. Although numerous studies have recently begun to characterize the neural substrates of visual memory processes, a neurophysiological index of storage capacity limitations has not yet been established. Here, we provide electrophysiological evidence for lateralized activity in humans that reflects the encoding and maintenance of items in visual memory. The amplitude of this activity is strongly modulated by the number of objects being held in the memory at the time, but approaches a limit asymptotically for arrays that meet or exceed storage capacity. Indeed, the precise limit is determined by each individual's memory capacity, such that the activity from low-capacity individuals reaches this plateau much sooner than that from high-capacity individuals. Consequently, this measure provides a strong neurophysiological predictor of an individual's capacity, allowing the demonstration of a direct relationship between neural activity and memory capacity.
Similar articles
-
Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory.Nature. 2005 Nov 24;438(7067):500-3. doi: 10.1038/nature04171. Nature. 2005. PMID: 16306992
-
The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions.Nature. 1997 Nov 20;390(6657):279-81. doi: 10.1038/36846. Nature. 1997. PMID: 9384378
-
Visual memory and visual perception recruit common neural substrates.Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev. 2004 Dec;3(4):207-21. doi: 10.1177/1534582304274070. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev. 2004. PMID: 15812107 Review.
-
Neurophysiological evidence for the time course of activation of global shape, part, and local contour representations during visual object categorization and memory.J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 May;19(5):734-49. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.5.734. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007. PMID: 17488201
-
Event-related potential measures of visual working memory.Clin EEG Neurosci. 2006 Oct;37(4):286-91. doi: 10.1177/155005940603700405. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2006. PMID: 17073166 Review.
Cited by
-
Right-lateralized alpha desynchronization during regularity discrimination: hemispheric specialization or directed spatial attention?Psychophysiology. 2015 May;52(5):638-47. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12399. Epub 2014 Dec 23. Psychophysiology. 2015. PMID: 25532558 Free PMC article.
-
Hemifield-specific control of spatial attention and working memory: Evidence from hemifield crossover costs.J Vis. 2020 Aug 3;20(8):24. doi: 10.1167/jov.20.8.24. J Vis. 2020. PMID: 32841317 Free PMC article.
-
Functional Evidence for a Cerebellar Node of the Dorsal Attention Network.J Neurosci. 2016 Jun 1;36(22):6083-96. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0344-16.2016. J Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 27251628 Free PMC article.
-
Cancer 'survivor-care': II. Disruption of prefrontal brain activation top-down control of working memory capacity as possible mechanism for chemo-fog/brain (chemotherapy-associated cognitive impairment).J Clin Pharm Ther. 2013 Aug;38(4):265-8. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12071. Epub 2013 May 8. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2013. PMID: 23656522 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The impact of top-down spatial attention on laterality and hemispheric asymmetry in the human parietal cortex.J Vis. 2016 Aug 1;16(10):2. doi: 10.1167/16.10.2. J Vis. 2016. PMID: 27494544 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical