Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 Mar;13(2):200-8; discussion 208-9.

Native versus primary prosthetic valve endocarditis: comparison of clinical features and long-term outcome in 353 patients

Affiliations
  • PMID: 15086258
Comparative Study

Native versus primary prosthetic valve endocarditis: comparison of clinical features and long-term outcome in 353 patients

Gianpaolo Romano et al. J Heart Valve Dis. 2004 Mar.

Abstract

Background and aim of the study: The study aim was to compare preoperative and intraoperative features, and long-term outcome of patients operated on for native (NVE) and primary prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE).

Methods: Between January 1978 and December 2002, 258 patients (mean age 47.5 +/- 16 years) were referred for NVE, and 95 for PVE. Demographics, clinical preoperative conditions, indications to surgery, microbiological data, surgical pathology, early postoperative course and long-term outcome were compared via hospital chart review and outpatient clinic follow up.

Results: Female sex prevailed in the PVE group (49.5%) versus NVE (27.1%; p < 0.0001). Mitral valve involvement was more common in PVE (46.3% versus 24.8%, p = 0.0001), and multivalvular in 16.3% of NVE patients versus 4.2% of PVE (p = 0.001). Active endocarditis (80.6% versus 58.9%, p = 0.00004) and preoperative embolism (29.5% versus 11.6%, p = 0.0002) were significantly prevalent in the NVE group. Emergency operation (21.1% versus 10.5%, p = 0.009) and preoperative NYHA class IV or V (40% versus 19.8%, p < 0.0001) were significantly more frequent in PVE. Overall hospital mortality was 11.3% (n = 40), with 6.6% among NVE patients and 24.2% among PVE (p < 0.0001). Mean follow up (94% complete) was 5.8 +/- 5.3 years (6.0 +/- 5.5 years for NVE versus 5.1 +/- 4.6 years for PVE, p = 0.191), and total follow up was 1,707.85 patient-years. Actuarial survival at 1, 5, 10 and 15 years was respectively 91, 82, 67.5 and 48.8% in NVE, and 79.7, 64.2, 33.5 and 33.5% in PVE (p = 0.0016). A significantly lower survival in PVE versus NVE was found for the mitral site subgroup (p = 0.018), but not for the aortic site (p = 0.14). Actuarial freedom from reoperation for recurrent endocarditis at 1, 5, 10 and 15 years was 97.5, 91.4, 80.5 and 49.4% in NVE versus 90.8, 84.9, 59.4 and 43.9% in PVE (p = 0.015).

Conclusion: PVE patients were older, presented with more compromised clinical conditions, and had worse early and long-term outcomes than NVE patients. PVE had a higher incidence of recurrence and worse prognosis, especially if the mitral valve was involved.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources