Comparative life histories and ecophysiology of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans
- PMID: 15088655
- DOI: 10.1023/b:gene.0000017638.02813.5a
Comparative life histories and ecophysiology of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans
Abstract
Numerous laboratory investigations have compared Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans for various life history traits and fitness related ecophysiological parameters. From presently available information, it is however difficult to get a general comparative pattern describing the divergence of their ecological niches and understanding their demographic success. Two environmental factors seem however to have played a major role: temperature and alcoholic resources. From an ecophysiological approach, D. simulans may be described as generally more sensitive to stresses; other results point to this species as more cold adapted than its sibling; in some cases, however, D. simulans may appear as better adapted to a warm environment. When investigated, ecophysiological traits show a lesser geographic variability in D. simulans than in D. melanogaster. Presently available information does not explain the ecological prevalence of D. simulans in many places with a mild temperate or subtropical climate. This is presumably due to the fact that most comparisons have been done at a single, standard temperature of 25 degrees C. Comparative studies should be undertaken, spanning the thermal ranges of the two species, and the phenotypic plasticity of ecophysiological traits should now be considered.
Similar articles
-
Comparative analysis of morphological traits among Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: genetic variability, clines and phenotypic plasticity.Genetica. 2004 Mar;120(1-3):165-79. doi: 10.1023/b:gene.0000017639.62427.8b. Genetica. 2004. PMID: 15088656 Review.
-
Male sterility thermal thresholds in Drosophila: D. simulans appears more cold-adapted than its sibling D. melanogaster.Genetica. 2002 Mar;114(2):195-205. doi: 10.1023/a:1015154329762. Genetica. 2002. PMID: 12041832
-
Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila simulans: so similar yet so different.Genetica. 2004 Mar;120(1-3):5-16. doi: 10.1023/b:gene.0000017626.41548.97. Genetica. 2004. PMID: 15088643 Review.
-
Ecological and genetic interactions in Drosophila-parasitoids communities: a case study with D. melanogaster, D. simulans and their common Leptopilina parasitoids in south-eastern France.Genetica. 2004 Mar;120(1-3):181-94. doi: 10.1023/b:gene.0000017640.78087.9e. Genetica. 2004. PMID: 15088657
-
Divergence of water balance mechanisms in two sibling species (Drosophila simulans and D. melanogaster): effects of growth temperatures.J Comp Physiol B. 2013 Apr;183(3):359-78. doi: 10.1007/s00360-012-0714-3. Epub 2012 Oct 19. J Comp Physiol B. 2013. PMID: 23080219
Cited by
-
Genetic variability and phenotypic plasticity of metric thoracic traits in an invasive drosophilid in America.Genetica. 2015 Aug;143(4):441-51. doi: 10.1007/s10709-015-9843-4. Epub 2015 May 29. Genetica. 2015. PMID: 26018013
-
Phenology of Drosophila species across a temperate growing season and implications for behavior.PLoS One. 2019 May 16;14(5):e0216601. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216601. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31095588 Free PMC article.
-
Quantitative morphometrical analysis of a North African population of Drosophila melanogaster: sexual dimorphism, and comparison with European populations.J Genet. 2008 Dec;87(4):373-82. doi: 10.1007/s12041-008-0060-0. J Genet. 2008. PMID: 19147927
-
Life-History Evolution and the Genetics of Fitness Components in Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics. 2020 Jan;214(1):3-48. doi: 10.1534/genetics.119.300160. Genetics. 2020. PMID: 31907300 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Drosophila melanogaster microbiome is shaped by strict filtering and neutrality along a latitudinal cline.Mol Ecol. 2022 Nov;31(22):5861-5871. doi: 10.1111/mec.16692. Epub 2022 Sep 23. Mol Ecol. 2022. PMID: 36094780 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases