Classification systems in orthopaedics
- PMID: 15089078
- DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200207000-00007
Classification systems in orthopaedics
Abstract
Classification systems help orthopaedic surgeons characterize a problem, suggest a potential prognosis, and offer guidance in determining the optimal treatment method for a particular condition. Classification systems also play a key role in the reporting of clinical and epidemiologic data, allowing uniform comparison and documentation of like conditions. A useful classification system is reliable and valid. Although the measurement of validity is often difficult and sometimes impractical, reliability-as summarized by intraobserver and interobserver reliability-is easy to measure and should serve as a minimum standard for validation. Reliability is measured by the kappa value, which distinguishes true agreement of various observations from agreement due to chance alone. Some commonly used classifications of musculoskeletal conditions have not proved to be reliable when critically evaluated.
Similar articles
-
Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of two classification systems for intra-articular calcaneal fractures.Foot Ankle Int. 2006 Apr;27(4):251-5. doi: 10.1177/107110070602700405. Foot Ankle Int. 2006. PMID: 16624214
-
Comparison of reliability between the Lenke and King classification systems for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using radiographs that were not premeasured.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jun 1;28(11):1148-56; discussion 1156-7. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000067265.52473.C3. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003. PMID: 12782983
-
Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the modified Ficat classification system of osteonecrosis of the femoral head.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Nov;78(11):1702-6. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199611000-00010. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996. PMID: 8934485
-
The interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the cooney classification of distal radius fractures between experienced orthopaedic surgeons.J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2007 Oct;32(5):509-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jhse.2007.03.002. Epub 2007 May 25. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2007. PMID: 17950210
-
Classification systems of soft tissue disorders of the neck and upper limb: do they satisfy methodological guidelines?J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Feb;49(2):141-9. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00519-6. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996. PMID: 8606315 Review.
Cited by
-
Automated Clustering Technique (ACT) for Early Onset Scoliosis: A preliminary report.Spine Deform. 2023 May;11(3):723-731. doi: 10.1007/s43390-022-00634-1. Epub 2023 Jan 26. Spine Deform. 2023. PMID: 36701107 Free PMC article.
-
The REVision Using Imaging to Guide Staging and Evaluation (REVISE) in ACL Reconstruction Classification.J Knee Surg. 2021 Apr;34(5):509-519. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1697902. Epub 2019 Sep 30. J Knee Surg. 2021. PMID: 31569256 Free PMC article.
-
Inter- and intraobserver agreement of three classification systems for lateral clavicle fractures - reliability comparison between two specialist groups.Patient Saf Surg. 2020 Jan 7;14:4. doi: 10.1186/s13037-019-0228-y. eCollection 2020. Patient Saf Surg. 2020. PMID: 31911821 Free PMC article.
-
Creation and Evaluation of a Severity Classification of Hyperkyphosis and Hypolordosis for Exercise Therapy.Life (Basel). 2023 Jun 14;13(6):1392. doi: 10.3390/life13061392. Life (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37374174 Free PMC article.
-
Classifications in Brief: The Nerot-Sirveaux Classification for Scapular Notching.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Dec;476(12):2454-2457. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000442. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018. PMID: 30179930 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources