Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Mar-Apr;24(2):122-30.
doi: 10.1177/0272989X04263153.

Influence of clinical and economical factors on the expert rating of appropriateness of preoperative use of recombinant erythropoietin in elective orthopedic surgery patients

Affiliations

Influence of clinical and economical factors on the expert rating of appropriateness of preoperative use of recombinant erythropoietin in elective orthopedic surgery patients

Patrick Taffé et al. Med Decis Making. 2004 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

To evaluate the relative impact of clinical factors and health care environment resources on the expert ratings of appropriateness of preoperative erythropoietin in elective orthopedic surgery, the authors analyzed 6905 individual votes on 496 clinical scenarios from 14 experts, applying a multivariate logistic model. Sixty-six percent of the indications were appropriate when resource constraints (RC) were not considered and 53% when they were, resulting in a drop in the median vote of 2 points on a 9-point scale (P < 0.05). Initial hemoglobin level, expected perioperative blood loss, and RC were by far the most significant contributors to the model (P < 0.01), but other factors (i.e., clinical specialty of the expert, prior history of transfusion reactions, patient age, cardiovascular disease, anemia of chronic disease) also contributed significantly (P< 0.01). For assessing appropriateness of care, this study confirms the need for detailed clinical scenarios and a multidisciplinary panel carefully selected to reflect those involved in the interventions under consideration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • The appropriateness method.
    Shekelle P. Shekelle P. Med Decis Making. 2004 Mar-Apr;24(2):228-31. doi: 10.1177/0272989X04264212. Med Decis Making. 2004. PMID: 15090107 No abstract available.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources