Bacterial and enzymatic bioassays for toxicity testing in the environment

Abstract

Microbioassays using bacteria or enzymes are increasingly applied to measure chemical toxicity in the environment. Attractive features of these assays may include low cost, rapid response to toxicants, high sample throughput, modest laboratory equipment and space requirements, low sample volume, portability, and reproducible responses. Enzymatic tests rely on measurement of either enzyme activity or enzyme biosynthesis. Dehydrogenases are the enzymes most used in toxicity testing. Assay of dehydrogenase activity is conveniently carried out using oxidoreduction dyes such as tetrazolium salts. Other enzyme activity tests utilize ATPases, esterases, phosphatases, urease, luciferase, beta-galactosidase, protease, amylase, or beta-glucosidase. Recently, the inhibition of enzyme (beta-galactosidase, tryptophanase, alpha-glucosidase) biosynthesis has been explored as a basis for toxicity testing. Enzyme biosynthesis was found to be generally more sensitive to organic chemicals than enzyme activity. Bacterial toxicity tests are based on bioluminescence, motility, growth, viability, ATP, oxygen uptake, nitrification, or heat production. An important aspect of bacterial tests is the permeability of cells to environmental toxicants, particularly organic chemicals of hydrophobic nature. Physical, chemical, and genetic alterations of the outer membrane of E. coli have been found to affect test sensitivity to organic toxicants. Several microbioassays are now commercially available. The names of the assays and their basis are: Microtox (bioluminescence), Polytox (respiration), ECHA Biocide Monitor (dehydrogenase activity), Toxi-Chromotest (enzyme biosynthesis), and MetPAD (enzyme activity). An important feature common to these tests is the provision of standardized cultures of bacteria in freeze-dried form. Two of the more recent applications of microbioassays are in sediment toxicity testing and toxicity reduction evaluation. Sediment pore water may be assayed directly or solvents may be used to extract the toxicants. Some of the solvents used for extraction of organic chemicals are themselves toxic to bacteria (e.g., dichloromethane), requiring exchange with a less toxic solvent (e.g., ethanol, methanol, DMSO). A modification of the Microtox test allows direct assay of solid-phase samples such as sediments. The toxicity reduction evaluation (TRE) must be carried out at wastewater treatment plants whose effluents fail toxicity standards. The TREs require numerous and repeated toxicity assays, thus favoring application of microbioassays. Presently, no single microbioassay can detect all categories of environmental toxicants with equal sensitivity. Therefore, a battery of tests approach is recommended. The differential sensitivity of alternative tests may, in fact, be exploited. Further research is needed to construct strains of genetically engineered microorganisms or isolate microorganisms or enzymes that respond to specific classes of toxicants. These can be combined into batteries appropriate for different environments or test objectives.