Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Mar;20(3):166-171.
doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000117924.65522.a1.

Return visits to a pediatric emergency department

Evaline A Alessandrini  1 , Jane M Lavelle, Stephanie M Grenfell, Cynthia R Jacobstein, Kathy N Shaw
Affiliations

Return visits to a pediatric emergency department

Evaline A Alessandrini et al. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2004 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the incidence of return visits (RVs), types of RVs, and factors associated with RVs to a pediatric emergency department (ED).

Methods: : Retrospective cohort study of patients seen in an urban, tertiary care pediatric ED.

Main outcome: RV within 48 hours, identified from a computerized log.

Results: The total RV rate was 3.5% (95% confidence interval, 3.3-3.6), similar to rates (2.4% to 3.4%) reported in general EDs. Most (78.5%) RVs were unscheduled, 17% were scheduled, and 4% were called back to the ED. Infectious disease (45%), respiratory (16%), and trauma (16%) accounted for most RV diagnoses. When compared with the overall ED population, RV patients were more likely to be younger than 2 years [relative risk, 1.3 (1.2-1.4)], to be admitted to the hospital [relative risk, 1.3 (1.2-1.5)], and to be triaged as acute [relative risk, 1.1 (1.0-1.2)]. Patients called back to the ED were younger, more likely to be triaged as acute, and more likely to be admitted than other RV patients. Significant diagnoses were made at RV in 7 (0.4%; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-0.7) patients, half of whom were called back to the ED or had a scheduled RV.

Conclusion: Similarities between our pediatric ED RV rate and other published research implies that benchmarking and quality improvement tools for RV can be used and compared in both pediatric and general EDs. Focusing on systems to call patients back to the ED when necessary may be an efficient way to reduce medical error and adverse patient outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Keith KD, Bocka JJ, Kobernick MS, et al. Emergency department revisits. Ann Emerg Med. 1989;18:964-968.
    1. Pierce JM, Kellerman AL, Oster C. "Bounces": An analysis of short-term return visits to a public hospital emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1990;19(7):752-757.
    1. Zimmerman DR, McCarten-Gibbs KA, DeNoble DH, et al. Repeat pediatric visits to a general emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;28:467-473.
    1. Gordon JA, An LC, Hayward RA, et al. Initial emergency department diagnosis and return visits: Risk versus perception. Ann Emerg Med. 1998;32:569-573.
    1. Parrish FC, Santen SA, Hemphill RR, et al. Emergency department 72-hour returns and admission rates [abstract]. Ann Emerg Med. 2000;36(4):s31.

LinkOut - more resources