Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Apr;92(2):233-41.

Medical faculty's use of print and electronic journals: changes over time and in comparison with scientists

Carol Tenopir  1 , Donald W King, Amy Bush
Affiliations

Medical faculty's use of print and electronic journals: changes over time and in comparison with scientists

Carol Tenopir et al. J Med Libr Assoc. 2004 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives are to determine how medical faculty members use scholarly journals, whether print or electronic journals are read more, whether there is a pattern among types of users, and what similarities and differences there are between the use of journals by medical faculty and faculty in other disciplines.

Methods: Medical faculty of the University of Tennessee Health Science Center (UTHSC) multi-campus system were surveyed, and their responses estimated using critical incident technique to characterize the different aspects of their use of print and electronic journals.

Results: Medical faculty read a great deal, especially compared to scientists. The most frequently reported principal purpose of reading is to support their primary research (30% of reading). The majority of reading comes from recently published articles, mostly from personal subscriptions. Medical faculty continue to rely on print journals (approximately 70% of readings) versus electronic journals. Age of faculty does not appear to influence the choice of print or electronic format. Medical faculty read more articles than others on average and need information digested and verified in a way to save them time. Convenience and currency are highly valued attributes.

Conclusions: It can be asserted that librarians and publishers must find ways to provide the attributes of convenience and currency and match the portability of personal subscriptions in an electronic journal format for medical faculty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Average amount of reading by medical faculty, nonuniversity medical professionals, and scientists
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kling R, McKim G. Scholarly communication and the continuum of electronic publishing. JASIS. 1999 Jul 19. 50(10):890–906.
    1. Kling R, Callahan E. Electronic journals, the Internet, and scholarly communication. In: Cronin B, ed. Ann Rev Inform Sci Technol. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 2003;37:127–77.
    1. Tenopir C, King DW, Boyce P, Grayson M, Zyhang Y, and Ebuen M. Patterns of journal use by scientists through three evolutionary phases. D-Lib Magazine [serial online] 2003 May;9(5). [cited 10 Dec 2003]. <http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may03/king/05king.html>.
    1. Tenopir C, King DW. Towards electronic journals: realities for scientists, librarians, and publishers. Washington, DC: Special Libraries Association, 2000.
    1. King DW, Tenopir C. Using and reading scholarly literature. In: Williams ME, ed. Ann Rev Inform Sci Technol. Medford, NJ: Information Technology Today, 2001;34:423–77.

LinkOut - more resources