Similar articles

• Systematic reviews involving complementary and alternative medicine interventions had higher quality of reporting than conventional medicine reviews.

  Lawson ML, Pham B, Klassen TP, Moher D. Lawson ML, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Aug;58(8):777-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.08.022. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005. PMID: 16018912
• Language of publication restrictions in systematic reviews gave different results depending on whether the intervention was conventional or complementary.

  Pham B, Klassen TP, Lawson ML, Moher D. Pham B, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Aug;58(8):769-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.08.021. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005. PMID: 16086467
• For randomized controlled trials, the quality of reports of complementary and alternative medicine was as good as reports of conventional medicine.

  Klassen TP, Pham B, Lawson ML, Moher D. Klassen TP, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Aug;58(8):763-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.08.020. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005. PMID: 16018911
• Interventions in chronic pain management. 3. New frontiers in pain management: complementary techniques.

  Braverman DL, Ericken JJ, Shah RV, Franklin DJ. Braverman DL, et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Mar;84(3 Suppl 1):S45-9. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2003.50049. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003. PMID: 12708558 Review.
• Neurostimulation for chronic noncancer pain: an evaluation of the clinical evidence and recommendations for future trial designs.

  Coffey RJ, Lozano AM. Coffey RJ, et al. J Neurosurg. 2006 Aug;105(2):175-89. doi: 10.3171/jns.2006.105.2.175. J Neurosurg. 2006. PMID: 17219820 Review.