Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: attitudes of bereaved parents
- PMID: 15102721
- PMCID: PMC1721668
- DOI: 10.1136/adc.2003.041392
Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: attitudes of bereaved parents
Abstract
Background: Interviews with neonatologists in a related study had revealed a degree of discomfort with approaching bereaved parents for postmortem examinations (PMs) and a widespread concern that parents should not be further distressed or feel under pressure to consent.
Objective: To report the attitudes of bereaved parents to trial related perinatal PMs, in the light of declining perinatal PM rates and poor levels of participation in pathology studies.
Methods: A qualitative study was carried out, using semistructured interviews. The study involved 11 interviews with 18 bereaved parents from five UK neonatal units. The parents had consented to the enrolment of their baby in one of two neonatal trials.
Results: The data provide support for the careful approach described by neonatologists in a related study, but also suggest that it may be possible to approach more parents without undermining their wellbeing. The interviews show the variety of reactions to PMs that one would expect, from parents who were clear that they did not want a PM to others who felt that they needed the information from the examination. Between these extremes were parents who were initially discomforted by the idea but who then made the decision to go ahead. Parents who elected to have a PM did so for their own needs, or to contribute to a trial, or for both reasons. The fact that the subject was raised was generally not seen as inappropriate, and none stated that they felt that they were actually pressured into making their decision. The data also suggest that for some parents the degree of caution and selectivity exercised by the neonatologists may not be entirely appropriate. In two cases, consent for the PM was driven by a sense of making an altruistic contribution to research, and, in another two, altruism was expressed in the context of their own desire for information from a PM.
Conclusions: It is important to determine whether trial related pathology studies are considered by professionals and lay people to be worth while and feasible. If there is support for such studies, the challenge is to develop the means to approach more parents in the most sensitive way.
Comment in
-
The continuing decline of autopsies in clinical trials: is there any way back?Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004 May;89(3):F198-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.045609. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004. PMID: 15102718 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: attitudes of neonatologists and pathologists.Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004 May;89(3):F204-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.2002.012732. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004. PMID: 15102720 Free PMC article.
-
Improving perinatal autopsy rates: who is counseling bereaved parents for autopsy consent?Birth. 1997 Mar;24(1):55-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536x.1997.tb00337.x. Birth. 1997. PMID: 9271968
-
Perinatal postmortems: what is important to parents and how do they decide?Birth. 2012 Mar;39(1):57-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2011.00513.x. Epub 2012 Jan 9. Birth. 2012. PMID: 22369606
-
Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: a review of the literature.Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004 May;89(3):F200-3. doi: 10.1136/adc.2002.012740. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004. PMID: 15102719 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical aspects of neonatal death and autopsy.Semin Neonatol. 2004 Aug;9(4):247-54. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2003.11.004. Semin Neonatol. 2004. PMID: 15251141 Review.
Cited by
-
Decision influences and aftermath: parents, stillbirth and autopsy.Health Expect. 2014 Aug;17(4):534-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00782.x. Epub 2012 Jun 19. Health Expect. 2014. PMID: 22708659 Free PMC article.
-
What factors are important to parents making decisions about neonatal research?Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005 May;90(3):F267-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.065078. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005. PMID: 15846021 Free PMC article.
-
What do parents want to know when considering autopsy for their child with cancer?J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2014 Aug;36(6):464-70. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000000078. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24309611 Free PMC article.
-
Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: attitudes of neonatologists and pathologists.Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004 May;89(3):F204-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.2002.012732. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004. PMID: 15102720 Free PMC article.
-
Parents' views of involvement in concurrent research with their neonates.J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010 Jun;5(2):47-55. doi: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.2.47. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010. PMID: 20569149 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical