Lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical lobular hyperplasia at core-needle biopsy: is excisional biopsy necessary?
- PMID: 15105449
- DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2313030874
Lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical lobular hyperplasia at core-needle biopsy: is excisional biopsy necessary?
Abstract
Purpose: To retrospectively determine frequency of invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) at excisional biopsy in women with atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) at percutaneous core-needle biopsy (CNB).
Materials and methods: Review of results in 6,081 consecutive patients who underwent CNB at two institutions revealed that in 35 (0.58%), LCIS (n = 15) or ALH (n = 20) was the pathologic finding with highest risk. Patient age range was 41-84 years (mean, 59 years). Of 35 patients, 26 (74%) underwent excisional biopsy and nine (26%) underwent mammographic follow-up for longer than 2 years. Lesions with a pathologic upgrade were noted when invasive cancer or DCIS occurred at the CNB site. CNB results in patients with a diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) (75 of 6,081 [1.2%]) were reviewed; these patients underwent subsequent excisional biopsy. Statistical comparison of frequency of upgrading of lesions in patients with a diagnosis of LCIS or ALH at CNB and in those with a diagnosis of ADH at CNB was performed (Pearson chi(2) test).
Results: In six (17%) of 35 (95% CI: 4.7%, 29.6%) patients, lesions were upgraded to DCIS (n = 4) or invasive cancer (n = 2). In 15 patients with LCIS diagnosed at CNB, lesions in four (27%) were upgraded to either DCIS or invasive cancer. In 20 patients with ALH diagnosed at CNB, lesions were upgraded to DCIS in two (10%). Lesions in nine patients who underwent mammographic follow-up were stable. No mammographic or technical findings distinguished patients with upgraded lesions from those whose lesions were not upgraded. In 12 (16%) of 75 (95% CI: 7.7%, 24.3%) patients with ADH, lesions were upgraded. Difference between the upgrade rate in patients with LCIS or ALH and that in those with ADH was not significant (P =.88).
Conclusion: Lesions in 17% of patients with LCIS or ALH at CNB were upgraded to invasive cancer or DCIS; this rate was similar to the upgrade rate in patients with ADH. Excisional biopsy is supported when LCIS, ALH, or ADH is diagnosed at CNB.
Copyright RSNA, 2004
Comment in
-
Cancer upgrades at excisional biopsy after diagnosis of atypical lobular hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ at core-needle biopsy: some reasons why.Radiology. 2004 Jun;231(3):617-21. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2313040154. Radiology. 2004. PMID: 15163803 Review. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Lobular neoplasia at 11-gauge vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy: correlation with surgical excisional biopsy and mammographic follow-up.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Oct;187(4):949-54. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0710. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006. PMID: 16985141
-
Lobular in-situ neoplasia on breast core needle biopsy: imaging indication and pathologic extent can identify which patients require excisional biopsy.Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Mar;19(3):914-21. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2034-3. Epub 2011 Aug 23. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012. PMID: 21861212
-
Follow-up surgical excision is indicated when breast core needle biopsies show atypical lobular hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ: a correlative study of 33 patients with review of the literature.Am J Surg Pathol. 2005 Apr;29(4):534-43. doi: 10.1097/01.pas.0000152566.78066.d1. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005. PMID: 15767810
-
Cancer upgrades at excisional biopsy after diagnosis of atypical lobular hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ at core-needle biopsy: some reasons why.Radiology. 2004 Jun;231(3):617-21. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2313040154. Radiology. 2004. PMID: 15163803 Review. No abstract available.
-
Factors affecting the under-diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by core needle biopsies - A 10-year retrospective study and review of the literature.Int J Surg. 2018 Jan;49:27-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Nov 13. Int J Surg. 2018. PMID: 29146271 Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of breast core needle biopsy technique on detection of lobular intraepithelial neoplasia.Ochsner J. 2007 Fall;7(3):121-4. Ochsner J. 2007. PMID: 21603526 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment and survival outcomes of lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: a SEER population based study.Oncotarget. 2017 Oct 3;8(61):103047-103054. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21461. eCollection 2017 Nov 28. Oncotarget. 2017. PMID: 29262543 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence of Adjacent Synchronous Invasive Carcinoma and/or Ductal Carcinoma In-situ in Patients with Lobular Neoplasia on Core Biopsy: Results from a Prospective Multi-Institutional Registry (TBCRC 020).Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar;23(3):722-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4922-4. Epub 2015 Nov 5. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016. PMID: 26542585 Free PMC article.
-
Upgrade rates of high-risk breast lesions diagnosed on core needle biopsy: a single-institution experience and literature review.Mod Pathol. 2016 Dec;29(12):1471-1484. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.127. Epub 2016 Aug 19. Mod Pathol. 2016. PMID: 27538687 Review.
-
Lobular Carcinoma in Situ with Atypical Mass Presentation: a Case Report.Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2016 Feb;38(2):112-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1571174. Epub 2016 Feb 3. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2016. PMID: 26883857 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical