Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Apr:50:569-75.

Antibiotics for lower respiratory tract infections. Still too frequently prescribed?

Affiliations

Antibiotics for lower respiratory tract infections. Still too frequently prescribed?

Warren J McIsaac et al. Can Fam Physician. 2004 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To examine how Canadian family physicians currently prescribe for lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs).

Design: Prospective assessment of adults with symptoms of LRTIs.

Setting: Offices of 120 community-based members of the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

Participants: Four hundred seven adults (16 years and older).

Main outcome measures: Clinical findings, diagnoses, tests ordered, and prescriptions for antibiotics were documented on a standardized form.

Results: Antibiotics were prescribed to 58.4% of patients presenting with symptoms of LRTIs. Prescribing was higher (77.9%) for those diagnosed with acute bronchitis, which accounted for 70.3% of prescriptions. Physicians were often uncertain about the need for antibiotics, were concerned that patients could become sicker, and felt pressured by patients to prescribe antibiotics. Macrolides were most frequently prescribed; no tests were ordered in 85.0% of encounters.

Conclusion: The number of antibiotic prescriptions for adults with LRTIs remains high in Canada. Rates of prescribing are increased by diagnosis of acute bronchitis, clinical uncertainty, pressure from patients to receive antibiotics, and concern that patients will deteriorate if left untreated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. N Engl J Med. 2002 Apr 18;346(16):1200-6 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2002 Mar 7;346(10):747-50 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 2002 Jun 19;287(23):3096-102 - PubMed
    1. Aust Fam Physician. 1994 Aug;23(8):1550-3 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1995 Jan 18;273(3):214-9 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances