Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Aug;77(6):437-42.
doi: 10.1007/s00420-004-0519-0. Epub 2004 Apr 30.

Expert assessment of physical ergonomics at video-display unit workstations: repeatability, validity and responsiveness to changes

Ritva Ketola  1 , Risto Toivonen, Ritva Luukkonen, Esa-Pekka Takala, Eira Viikari-Juntura
Affiliations

Expert assessment of physical ergonomics at video-display unit workstations: repeatability, validity and responsiveness to changes

Ritva Ketola et al. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2004 Aug.

Abstract

Aims: Inter-observer repeatability, validity and responsiveness to change were determined for an expert assessment method for video-display unit (VDU) workstation ergonomics. The aim was to determine to what extent the expert assessment of ergonomics is related to the technical measurements, tidiness and space, work chair ergonomics and responds to changes in these characteristics.

Methods: Technical measurements and video-recordings before and 2 months after an ergonomic intervention were made for 109 VDU office workstations. Two experts in ergonomics analysed and rated the ergonomics of the workstations. A researcher analysed tidiness and available space. A physiotherapist classified the work chairs used according to their ergonomic properties.

Results: The intra-class correlation coefficient between the workstation ergonomic ratings of the two experts was 0.74 at the baseline and 0.81 at the follow-up. Workstation tidiness and space, and work chair ergonomics, had a strong effect on the assessments of both experts. For both experts a change in the locations of the mouse, the screen and the keyboard and values of tidiness and space and work chair ergonomics during the intervention showed a significant association with the ratings.

Conclusion: The assessment method studied can be utilized by an expert in a repeatable manner both in cross-sectional and in longitudinal settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2002 Feb;28(1):18-24 - PubMed
    1. Ergonomics. 1999 Oct;42(10):1333-49 - PubMed
    1. Hum Factors. 1983 Apr;25(2):161-75 - PubMed
    1. Am J Ind Med. 1996 Feb;29(2):161-70 - PubMed
    1. Ergonomics. 1997 Nov;40(11):1255-68 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources