Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Apr-Jun;8(2):103-7.

1000 office-based hysteroscopies prior to in vitro fertilization: feasibility and findings

Affiliations

1000 office-based hysteroscopies prior to in vitro fertilization: feasibility and findings

Mary D Hinckley et al. JSLS. 2004 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Hysteroscopy offers diagnostic accuracy and the ability to treat uterine pathology, but practitioners may be reluctant to perform it without a high index of suspicion because it traditionally requires an operating room. This study reviews the findings and feasibility of office-based diagnostic and operative hysteroscopy in an unselected in vitro fertilization (IVF) population to evaluate whether first-line hysteroscopy should be recommended.

Methods: One thousand consecutive infertile patients scheduled for in vitro fertilization underwent office hysteroscopy. A rigid 20-degree 5-mm hysteroscope, with an operative channel for grasping forceps, scissors, or coaxial bipolar electrode was used. Operative findings, complications, and patient tolerance were noted.

Results: Sixty-two percent of patients had a normal uterine cavity. Thirty-two percent had endometrial polyps. Other pathology included submucous fibroids (3%), intrauterine adhesions (3%), polypoid endometrium (0.9%), septum (0.5%) retained products of conception (0.3%), and bicornuate uterus (0.3%). The pathology was treated in all patients without complication.

Conclusions: When hysteroscopy is routinely performed prior to in vitro fertilization, a significant percentage of patients have uterine pathology that may impair the success of fertility treatment. Patient tolerance, safety, and the feasibility of simultaneous operative correction make office hysteroscopy an ideal procedure.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, RESOLVE 2000 Assisted Reproductive Technology Success Rates. December 2002. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/ART00/index.htm
    1. Frydman R, Eibschitz I, Fernandez H, Hamou J. Uterine evaluation by microhysteroscopy in IVF candidates. Hum Reprod. 1987;2:481–485 - PubMed
    1. Seinera P, Maccario S, Visentin L, DiGregorio A. Hysteroscopy in an IVF-ER program. Clinical experience with 360 infertile patients. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1988;67:135–137 - PubMed
    1. Wang CW, Lee CL, Lai YM, Tsai CC, Chang MY, Soong YK. Comparison of hysterosalpingography and hysteroscopy in female infertility. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1996;3:581–584 - PubMed
    1. Golan A, Eilat E, Ron-El R, Herman A, Soffer Y, Bukovsky I. Hysteroscopy is superior to hysterosalpingography in infertility investigation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1996;75:654–656 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources