Orthotopic models of cancer for preclinical drug evaluation: advantages and disadvantages
- PMID: 15120041
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2003.11.021
Orthotopic models of cancer for preclinical drug evaluation: advantages and disadvantages
Abstract
Considering the enormous effort that has taken place over the years to discover new chemotherapeutic drugs for treating the common cancers, the conventional murine and xenograft test systems used to test efficacy for drug development have identified only a limited number of useful agents that are active clinically at well tolerated doses. In recent years, considerable effort has been made to develop more clinically relevant models by the use of orthotopic transplantation of tumour material in rodents. It has been shown that it is now possible to transplant tumour material from a variety of tumour types into the appropriate anatomical site and often these tumours will metastasise in a similar manner and to similar locations as the same tumour type will in human cancer. As yet, although a body of literature has amassed on the technique itself and its implications for metastasis, there are relatively few laboratories using these test systems in drug development programmes. Nevertheless, given the expertise now being developed and some interesting observations being made on the role of the tumour site on response to therapeutic agents, it is likely that the use of orthotopic systems will strengthen our ability to select the most appropriate molecules for recommended use in clinical studies.
Similar articles
-
Integrating pharmacology and in vivo cancer models in preclinical and clinical drug development.Eur J Cancer. 2004 Apr;40(6):837-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.01.003. Eur J Cancer. 2004. PMID: 15120039 Review.
-
Of mice and men: values and liabilities of the athymic nude mouse model in anticancer drug development.Eur J Cancer. 2004 Apr;40(6):827-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2003.11.028. Eur J Cancer. 2004. PMID: 15120038 Review.
-
Orthotopic metastatic (MetaMouse) models for discovery and development of novel chemotherapy.Methods Mol Med. 2005;111:297-322. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-889-7:297. Methods Mol Med. 2005. PMID: 15911987
-
[Preclinical evaluation of anticancer drugs: a model remaining a model!].Bull Cancer. 1998 Oct;85(10):837-42. Bull Cancer. 1998. PMID: 9835860 French.
-
Spontaneous and genetically engineered animal models; use in preclinical cancer drug development.Eur J Cancer. 2004 Apr;40(6):858-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2003.11.031. Eur J Cancer. 2004. PMID: 15120042 Review.
Cited by
-
Doxorubicin-conjugated polypeptide nanoparticles inhibit metastasis in two murine models of carcinoma.J Control Release. 2015 Jun 28;208:52-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.01.033. Epub 2015 Jan 28. J Control Release. 2015. PMID: 25637704 Free PMC article.
-
Preclinical screening methods in cancer.Indian J Pharmacol. 2016 Sep-Oct;48(5):481-486. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.190716. Indian J Pharmacol. 2016. PMID: 27721530 Free PMC article.
-
Development of novel tumor-targeted theranostic nanoparticles activated by membrane-type matrix metalloproteinases for combined cancer magnetic resonance imaging and therapy.Small. 2014 Feb 12;10(3):566-75, 417. doi: 10.1002/smll.201301456. Epub 2013 Aug 27. Small. 2014. PMID: 24038954 Free PMC article.
-
Characterization of human pancreatic orthotopic tumor xenografts suitable for drug screening.Cell Oncol (Dordr). 2011 Dec;34(6):511-21. doi: 10.1007/s13402-011-0049-1. Epub 2011 Jun 17. Cell Oncol (Dordr). 2011. PMID: 21681527
-
Spheroid-plug model as a tool to study tumor development, angiogenesis, and heterogeneity in vivo.Tumour Biol. 2016 Feb;37(2):2481-96. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-4065-z. Epub 2015 Sep 18. Tumour Biol. 2016. PMID: 26385771 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials