Vasa previa: the impact of prenatal diagnosis on outcomes
- PMID: 15121568
- DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000123245.48645.98
Vasa previa: the impact of prenatal diagnosis on outcomes
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate outcomes and predictors of neonatal survival in pregnancies complicated by vasa previa and to compare outcomes in prenatally diagnosed cases of vasa previa with those not diagnosed prenatally.
Methods: We performed a multicenter study of 155 pregnancies complicated by vasa previa. Cases were obtained from the Vasa Previa Foundation and 6 large hospitals. Comparisons were made between groups based on prenatal diagnosis status and neonatal survival.
Results: The overall perinatal mortality was 36% (55 of 155). In 61 cases (39%), vasa previa was diagnosed prenatally; 59 of 61 (97%) infants from these pregnancies survived compared with 41 of 94 (44%) in cases not diagnosed prenatally (P <.001). Median 1- and 5-minute Apgar scores in cases diagnosed prenatally were 8 and 9, respectively, compared with 1 and 4 among survivors in cases not diagnosed prenatally (P <.001). More than half (24 of 41) of surviving neonates born to women without prenatal diagnosis required blood transfusions compared with 2 of 59 diagnosed prenatally (P <.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the only significant predictors of neonatal survival were prenatal diagnosis (P <.001) and gestational age at delivery (P =.01).
Conclusions: Good outcomes with vasa previa depend primarily on prenatal diagnosis and cesarean delivery at 35 weeks of gestation or earlier should rupture of membranes, labor, or significant bleeding occur.
Similar articles
-
Outcomes of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a population-based study in Western Australia.Pediatrics. 2005 Sep;116(3):e356-63. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2845. Pediatrics. 2005. PMID: 16140678
-
Umbilical cord prolapse. Is the time from diagnosis to delivery critical?J Reprod Med. 1998 Feb;43(2):129-32. J Reprod Med. 1998. PMID: 9513874
-
Is neonatal risk from vasa previa preventable? The 20-year experience from a single medical center.J Clin Ultrasound. 2010 Mar-Apr;38(3):118-22. doi: 10.1002/jcu.20665. J Clin Ultrasound. 2010. PMID: 20091699
-
Fetal and neonatal hepatic tumors.J Pediatr Surg. 2007 Nov;42(11):1797-803. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.07.047. J Pediatr Surg. 2007. PMID: 18022426 Review.
-
Perinatal outcome of pregnancies with prenatal diagnosis of vasa previa: systematic review and meta-analysis.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 May;57(5):710-719. doi: 10.1002/uog.22166. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 32735754
Cited by
-
Monochorionic Diamniotic Vasa Previa Pregnancy: A Medical Student Perspective.Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Apr 6;2021:5513139. doi: 10.1155/2021/5513139. eCollection 2021. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33880195 Free PMC article.
-
Risk-adapted management for vasa praevia: a retrospective study about individualized timing of caesarean section.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Jun;299(6):1545-1550. doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05125-9. Epub 2019 Mar 26. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019. PMID: 30915634 Free PMC article.
-
A case report of vasa previa incidentally discovered.Pan Afr Med J. 2015 May 18;21:34. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2015.21.34.6697. eCollection 2015. Pan Afr Med J. 2015. PMID: 26405470 Free PMC article.
-
Case report of recurrent vasa previa.Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2024 Aug 27;28(1):e12405. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12405. eCollection 2025 Feb. Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2024. PMID: 39871856 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of ultrasound-based antenatal screening strategies to detect vasa praevia in the United Kingdom: An exploratory study using decision analytic modelling methods.PLoS One. 2022 Dec 20;17(12):e0279229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279229. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 36538562 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical