Natural history of sinus node disease treated with atrial pacing in 213 patients: implications for selection of stimulation mode

Abstract

Objectives: This study was designed to analyze the incidence and determinants of complications and long-term survival in sinus node disease treated with atrial pacing.

Background: Knowledge of the natural history of sinus node disease treated with different pacing modes is imperfect, and controversy exists regarding the optimal pacemaker therapy.

Methods: A consecutive series of 213 patients with sinus node disease initially treated with atrial pacing was studied for a median follow-up period of 60 months. The end points studied were permanent atrial fibrillation, high grade atrioventricular (AV) block, P wave undersensing, pacing mode change, reoperation and death. Several prognostic factors were evaluated statistically and the survival rate was compared with that of a matched general population.

Results: The incidence rate of permanent atrial fibrillation during follow-up was 7% (1.4%/year). The risk of this arrhythmia increased substantially with age greater than or equal to 70 years at pacemaker implantation. Only 2 of the 15 patients who developed permanent atrial fibrillation required ventricular pacing. High grade AV block occurred in 8.5% (1.8%/year) and its incidence was much greater in patients with complete bundle branch block or bifascicular block (35%) than in patients without such conduction disturbances (6%). A change to ventricular or dual-chamber stimulation was necessary in 14% of all patients, primarily because of early lead dislodgment or high grade AV block. Surgical intervention with maintenance of atrial pacing was required in 7% of patients. The survival rates of 97% at 1 year, 89% at 5 years and 72% at 10 years did not differ significantly from those of a matched general population.

Conclusions: In sinus node disease, atrial pacing can be successfully applied during long-term follow-up. Patients with complete bundle branch or bifascicular block in addition to sinus node disease should initially receive a dual-chamber pacemaker, but routine application of dual-chamber stimulation does not appear to be warranted.