Surgery for multiple hepatic colorectal metastases
- PMID: 15127269
- DOI: 10.1007/s00534-002-0754-2
Surgery for multiple hepatic colorectal metastases
Abstract
The purpose of this review is to address three important questions concerning hepatic resection for multiple colorectal metastases. (1) Is the number of tumors truly a significant prognostic factor? (2) Are patients with four or more tumors contraindicated for hepatic resection? (3) Up to how many nodules should we attempt to resect? Although the efficacy of surgical resection for one to three hepatic metastases is clear, based on several reports, the literature regarding the resection of four or more metastatic lesions is conflicting. Review of the data at our institutions showed that the number of tumors was a significant prognostic factor, because patient survival after liver resection for multiple metastases was worse than that for single metastasis. However, patients with two or three nodules and those with four or more nodules showed the same survival curves, or those with four or more metastases fared even better. Therefore, patients with four or more metastases should be considered for hepatic resection. The maximum number of hepatic tumors in longterm survivors reported in the literature has been increasing, and the limit for the number of respectable metastases has not yet been determined. Because liver resection is still the only treatment that offers a cure, surgery for multiple metastases may be justified as long as the operation is safe and technically feasible.
Similar articles
-
[Diagnosis and treatment of colorectal liver metastases - workflow].Zentralbl Chir. 2008 Jun;133(3):267-84. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1076796. Zentralbl Chir. 2008. PMID: 18563694 Review. German.
-
Longterm results and prognostic indicators after cryotherapy and hepatic arterial chemotherapy with or without resection for colorectal liver metastases in 224 patients: longterm survival can be achieved in patients with multiple bilateral liver metastases.J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Jan;202(1):100-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.08.026. Epub 2005 Nov 2. J Am Coll Surg. 2006. PMID: 16377503
-
[Prognostic factors for long-term outcome of hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases].Chir Ital. 2005 Sep-Oct;57(5):555-70. Chir Ital. 2005. PMID: 16241086 Italian.
-
Resection for multiple metastatic liver tumors after portal embolization.Surgery. 1994 Jun;115(6):674-7. Surgery. 1994. PMID: 8197557
-
Predictive models in colorectal liver metastases--can we personalize treatment and outcome?Dig Surg. 2008;25(6):406-12. doi: 10.1159/000184731. Epub 2009 Feb 12. Dig Surg. 2008. PMID: 19212112 Review.
Cited by
-
Locoregional surgical and interventional therapies for advanced colorectal cancer liver metastases: expert consensus statements.HPB (Oxford). 2013 Feb;15(2):119-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00597.x. HPB (Oxford). 2013. PMID: 23297723 Free PMC article.
-
Right portal vein embolization before right hepatectomy for unilobar colorectal liver metastases reduces the intrahepatic recurrence rate.Ann Surg. 2006 Jul;244(1):71-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000217609.26178.35. Ann Surg. 2006. PMID: 16794391 Free PMC article.
-
Local Treatment of Breast Cancer Liver Metastasis.Cancers (Basel). 2019 Sep 11;11(9):1341. doi: 10.3390/cancers11091341. Cancers (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31514362 Free PMC article. Review.
-
New paradigm in the management of liver-only metastases from colorectal cancer.Gastrointest Cancer Res. 2007 Jan;1(1):20-7. Gastrointest Cancer Res. 2007. PMID: 19262699 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of frozen section in the diagnosis of liver mass lesions.J Clin Pathol. 2006 Apr;59(4):352-4. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2005.029538. Epub 2006 Feb 17. J Clin Pathol. 2006. PMID: 16489181 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical