Primary exchange revision arthroplasty for infected total knee replacement: a long-term study
- PMID: 15132327
Primary exchange revision arthroplasty for infected total knee replacement: a long-term study
Abstract
Infected knee replacement is a serious complication that requires significant hospital-based resources for successful management. A successful primary exchange revision technique offers decreased morbidity for the patient by eliminating a second major operation and associated hospitalization, which in turn substantially reduces the cost associated with this dreaded condition. Twenty-two consecutive infected primary total knee arthroplasties in 22 patients were treated with primary exchange revision arthroplasties using antibiotic-impregnated cement. The surgical technique consisted of excision of draining sinuses, complete synovectomy, removal of granulation tissue, and debulking of the extensor mechanism. Postoperative treatment consisted of 4 to 6 weeks of parenterally administered antibiotics and 6 to 12 months of orally administered antibiotics. Both gram-positive and gram-negative organisms were treated. At an average follow-up of 10.2 years (range, 1.4 to 19.6 years), 90.9% were free of recurrent infection. Knee scores averaged 79.5, with 85.7% good or excellent results. The physiological classification of the host appeared to influence the outcome of revision. All patients in class A or B (20 knees) had successful eradication of their primary infection after 1-stage revision, whereas the only failure in the group was a physiological class C patient, who eventually expired from ongoing end-organ liver failure. These results compare most favorably with those of delayed-exchange revision arthroplasty while providing a more cost-effective management program.
Similar articles
-
[Our experience with revision total knee arthroplasty].Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2005;72(1):6-15. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2005. PMID: 15860146 Czech.
-
Treatment of the infected total knee arthroplasty with insertion of another prosthesis. The effect of antibiotic-impregnated bone cement.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Dec;(309):44-55. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994. PMID: 7994976
-
Treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Feb;(299):169-72. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994. PMID: 8119013
-
Articulating antibiotic impregnated spacers in two-stage revision of infected total knee arthroplasty.J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Nov;94(11 Suppl A):123-5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B11.30747. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012. PMID: 23118399 Review.
-
The infected total knee arthroplasty: just when you thought it was over.J Arthroplasty. 2004 Jun;19(4 Suppl 1):51-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.03.001. J Arthroplasty. 2004. PMID: 15190550 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical faceoff: One- versus two-stage exchange arthroplasty for prosthetic joint infections.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jun;471(6):1750-3. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2882-1. Epub 2013 Mar 1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013. PMID: 23456190 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Better function for fusions versus above-the-knee amputations for recurrent periprosthetic knee infection.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Oct;470(10):2737-45. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2322-7. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012. PMID: 22451336 Free PMC article.
-
High rate of infection control with one-stage revision of septic knee prostheses excluding MRSA and MRSE.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 May;470(5):1461-71. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2174-6. Epub 2011 Nov 12. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012. PMID: 22081299 Free PMC article.
-
Is single-stage revision according to a strict protocol effective in treatment of chronic knee arthroplasty infections?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jan;473(1):8-14. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3721-8. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015. PMID: 24923669 Free PMC article.
-
Revision of infected knee arthroplasties in Denmark.Acta Orthop. 2016 Aug;87(4):333-8. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2016.1148453. Epub 2016 Feb 22. Acta Orthop. 2016. PMID: 26900908 Free PMC article.