Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Jun;10(3):281-8.
doi: 10.1023/B:JICE.0000026925.41543.7c.

Nonsurgical transthoracic epicardial approach in patients with ventricular tachycardia and previous cardiac surgery

Affiliations

Nonsurgical transthoracic epicardial approach in patients with ventricular tachycardia and previous cardiac surgery

Eduardo Sosa et al. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2004 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: The subxyphoid pericardial mapping approach can be used to facilitate catheter ablation of postmyocardial-infarction ventricular tachycardia (post-MI VT), but the presence of dense adhesions is thought to preclude this approach in patients who have previously undergone open-chest cardiac surgery.

Aims of the study: This study reports the first use of a nonsurgical transthoracic epicardial approach in patients with scar-related VT and previous cardiac surgery.

Methods: Five patients with a mean age of 67 +/- 10 years, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 40 +/- 4.3%) and recurrent VT occurring 7 months to 10 years after cardiac surgery underwent combined endocardial and epicardial mapping and ablation during the same session. Because pericardial adhesions were anticipated to be denser in the anterior wall, the nonsurgical transthoracic epicardial puncture was directed to the inferior wall of the left ventricle. Failure to interrupt VT with radio frequency (RF) energy pulses delivered at the best endocardial or epicardial site prompted changing from one approach to the other.

Results: During the epicardial puncture procedure, the contrast medium accumulated in the inferior wall instead of spreading around the cardiac silhouette. The pericardial sac could be entered in all patients, and mapping of the inferolateral epicardial wall of the left ventricle was feasible. Fourteen VTs were induced, of which 8 could not be mapped because of poor hemodynamic tolerance. Three of the remaining 6 mappable VTs were eliminated by endocardial ablation, 2 required an epicardial RF pulse to be rendered noninducible, and 1 VT was not eliminated. No intra- or postprocedural complications were noted despite full heparinization.

Conclusion: Nonsurgical transthoracic epicardial catheter mapping and ablation of epicardial VT related to the inferolateral left ventricular wall are feasible in patients who have previously undergone open- cardiac surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Circulation. 2000 Mar 21;101(11):1297-302 - PubMed
    1. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2000 Nov;2(6):537-44 - PubMed
    1. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1996 Jun;7(6):531-6 - PubMed
    1. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998 Mar;21(3):553-8 - PubMed
    1. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1999 Jun;10(6):860-5 - PubMed

MeSH terms