Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004;143(3):187-90.

[Evaluation of three dosage regimens of amikacin using pharmacokinetic models in patients with cystic fibrosis]

[Article in Czech]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 15134039

[Evaluation of three dosage regimens of amikacin using pharmacokinetic models in patients with cystic fibrosis]

[Article in Czech]
M Halacová et al. Cas Lek Cesk. 2004.

Abstract

Background: Once-daily administration of aminoglykosides is routinely used, but comparative efficacy data for patients with cystic fibrosis are not available.

Methods and results: The aim of the this study was to compare the predicted pharmacodynamic (PD) activity of amikacin at 28 mg/kg/den administered every 24 hod.(q24h), q12h, and q8h. Pharmacokinetic (PK) data were derived from analysis of the amikacin serum concentration from 42 CF children patients. Individual pharmacokinetics values were used to construct serum concentration--versus time curves and to determine various indices (c peak/MIC ratio and time during the concentration was less than the MIC--T < MIC) for all three dose regimens described above. MIC (minimal inhibitory concentration) for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 4 mg/l. Significantly lower c peak/MIC but shorter T < MIC were noted when regimens of q8h versus q12h (p < 0.001), q8h vs. q24h (p < 0.001) and q12h vs. q24h (p < 0.001) were compared. This analysis suggests that the potential advantage of achieving a greater c peak/MIC with once-daily aminoglycoside administration may be neutralized by the significantly greater T < MIC in CF patients compared with that achieved with multiple-daily-dosing regimens.

Conclusions: Routine use of once daily amikacin administration could not be recommended until the clinical data confirming efficiency of this dose modality are available.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Publication types