Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2004 May;125(5):1693-9.
doi: 10.1378/chest.125.5.1693.

Leukotriene modifier vs inhaled corticosteroid in mild-to-moderate asthma: clinical and anti-inflammatory effects

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Leukotriene modifier vs inhaled corticosteroid in mild-to-moderate asthma: clinical and anti-inflammatory effects

Diahn-Warng Perng et al. Chest. 2004 May.

Abstract

Study objective: Evidence for the anti-inflammatory activity of leukotriene receptor antagonists in humans is somewhat limited. There are also no data comparing the anti-inflammatory effects of leukotriene receptor antagonists with those of inhaled corticosteroids. This study was designed to assess the clinical efficacy and anti-inflammatory effects of leukotriene receptor antagonist plus low-dose inhaled corticosteroids compared to those of a high-dose inhaled corticosteroid in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma.

Methods: Forty-nine patients with newly diagnosed asthma were recruited. They were randomly assigned to groups that received, for a 6-week period, either (1) budesonide, 600 microg bid (1,200 microg/d) or (2) budesonide, 200 microg (400 microg/d), and zafirlukast, 20 mg bid. The variables of asthma control were recorded daily. Sputum induction and methacholine provocation tests were performed.

Results: The results indicated that the administration of a low-dose inhaled corticosteroid plus zafirlukast was as effective as that of a high-dose inhaled corticosteroid regarding clinical improvement and anti-inflammatory effects (ie, eosinophil percentage, and eosinophilic cationic protein [ECP] and cysteinyl leukotriene C4 levels in induced sputum). Nineteen (group 1, 8 patients; group 2, 11 patients) of 49 patients (38.8%) had returned to normal airway responsiveness after treatment. Among these patients, 16 patients (84.2%) had normal ECP levels and 10 patients (52.6%) had normal percentages of eosinophils. ECP level, but not the eosinophil percentage, was significantly associated with symptom scores. The peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) showed a significant correlation with the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) instead of with symptom scores.

Conclusions: The addition of a leukotriene modifier to treatment with low-dose inhaled corticosteroids is equivalent to treatment with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids in patients with newly diagnosed mild-to-moderate asthma. In addition to symptoms and PEFR, the monitoring of ECP and PC20 may be of great value in achieving optimal control of asthma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types