Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 May 11;170(10):1551-6.
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1031928.

Displacement of Canada's largest public illicit drug market in response to a police crackdown

Affiliations

Displacement of Canada's largest public illicit drug market in response to a police crackdown

Evan Wood et al. CMAJ. .

Abstract

Background: Law enforcement is often used in an effort to reduce the social, community and health-related harms of illicit drug use by injection drug users (IDUs). There are, however, few data on the benefits of such enforcement or on the potential harms. A large-scale police "crackdown" to control illicit drug use in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside provided us with an opportunity to evaluate the effect.

Methods: As part of our ongoing prospective cohort study of IDUs in Vancouver, we examined data collected from 244 IDUs in the 3 months before the police crackdown and from 142 IDUs in the 3 months after the start of the crackdown, on Apr. 7, 2003. All study subjects were active drug users. We also examined external data on needle exchanges and syringe disposal.

Results: The 2 groups of IDUs were statistically similar: they were mainly young (mean age 39 years) and male (63%), and they had injected illicit drugs for 13 years on average. Ethnic background and the proportion homeless were also similar. There were no statistically significant reported differences (all p > 0.1) in the street price of heroin, cocaine or "crack" in the 2 periods. In the 3-month periods before and after the crackdown, respectively, the rates of daily heroin injection were 27.9% and 26.8%, daily cocaine injection 28.7% and 27.5%, and daily crack use 59.4% and 60.6% (all p > 0.1). The proportions of study subjects receiving methadone treatment, 41.0% and 44.4% (p = 0.516), did not differ. However, the proportions reporting a change in where drugs were used, 22.5% and 33.8% (p < 0.05), and the proportions reporting a change in the neighbourhood of use because of police presence, 18.1% and 26.8% (p < 0.05), increased significantly. Needle-exchange data confirmed that the community levels of drug use were unchanged. Disposal statistics demonstrated that the monthly average number of used syringes found on the streets outside the traditional area of drug use increased from 784 in the 3 months before Apr. 1 to 1253 in the subsequent 3 months (p = 0.002) and the monthly average number of used syringes found in public boxes for the safe disposal of syringes decreased from 865 to 502 (p = 0.018).

Interpretation: The effort to control illicit drug use did not alter the price of drugs or the frequency of use, nor did it encourage enrollment in methadone treatment programs. Several measures indicated displacement of injection drug use from the area of the crackdown into adjacent areas of the city, which has implications for both recruitment of new initiates into injection drug use and HIV prevention efforts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Fig. 1: Total number of used syringes discarded in public before and after a large-scale police “crackdown” to control illicit drug use in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside (DTES). The “core” was defined as the area within a 1-block radius of the corner of Main and Hastings streets; the remainder of the DTES was considered “outside the core.”

References

    1. Wall R, Rehm J, Fischer B, Brands B, Gliksman L, Stewart J, et al. Social costs of untreated opioid dependence. J Urban Health 2000;77:688-722. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fischer B, Medved W, Kirst M, Rehm J, Gliksman L. Illicit opiates and crime: results of an untreated user cohort study in Toronto. Can J Criminol 2001; 43:197-217.
    1. Palepu A, Tyndall MW, Leon H, Muller J, O'Shaughnessy MV, Schechter MT, et al. Hospital utilization and costs in a cohort of injection drug users. CMAJ 2001;165(4):415-20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wood E, Kerr T, Spittal PM, Tyndall MW, O'Shaughnessy MV, Schechter MT. The healthcare and fiscal costs of the illicit drug use epidemic: the impact of conventional drug control strategies and the impact of a comprehensive approach. B C Med J 2003;45:130-6.
    1. Drucker E. Drug prohibition and public health: 25 years of evidence. Public Health Rep 1999;114(1):14-29. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources