[Diagnostic value of postbronchoscopic sputum, bronchoscopic lavage, and transbronchial biopsy in peripheral lung cancer]

Abstract

The aim of this prospective study was to review the value of bronchoscopic lavage, transbronchial biopsy and postbronchoscopic sputum cytology in peripheral lung cancer. Two groups of patients were involved in the study who were treated in our clinic between the years 1999 and 2001: Group I (22 patients; average age 64 +/- 9 years; 18 males and four females) whose lesions were peripherally localised on chest radiographs and Group II (28 patients; average age 61 +/- 8; 26 males and two females) whose lesions were centrally localised and were visible only by diagnostic bronchoscopic procedures. The following procedures and analysis were done in all patients: Cytologic analysis of prebroncoscopic sputum, bronchoscopic lavage, bronchial biopsy, and patients were asked to give sputum in 30 minutes after bronchoscopy. The final diagnosis of all patients was primary lung cancer. In the first group none of the patients had visible endobronchial lesion on fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Sputum cytology of the patients were negative before bronchoscopy. Bronchoscopic lavage cytology was positive in five of 22 patients (22.7%). Transbronchial biopsy provided better diagnostic yield (50%) than postbronchoscopic sputum (31.8%). In the second group of patients, cytologic analysis was positive 25%, 96.4% and 42.9% in bronchoscopic lavage, bronchial biopsy and postbronchoscopic sputum respectively. Our findings suggest that postbronchoscopic sputum cytology may be an important diagnostic procedure in endoscopically nonvisible pulmonary cancer. Since its application is easy and noninvasive, cytologic analysis of postbronchoscopic sputum may be preferable to bronchoscopic biopsy although a favorable diagnostic yield is not expected.