Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 May-Jun;51(57):762-7.

Gastrointestinal adverse reactions following anthrax vaccination: an analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database

Affiliations
  • PMID: 15143911

Gastrointestinal adverse reactions following anthrax vaccination: an analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database

Mark R Geier et al. Hepatogastroenterology. 2004 May-Jun.

Abstract

Background/aims: The Institute of Medicine (IOM) of the United States Academy of Sciences in 2000 encouraged the evaluation of active long-term monitoring studies of large populations to further evaluate the relative safety of anthrax vaccine. Anthrax is a deadly bacterial infectious disease that currently has been engineered as a biological warfare agent. The vaccine produced against anthrax is a cell-free crude culture of the various toxin components of the natural disease. The U.S. military current goal is to vaccinate its entire personnel by 2003. The purpose of this study was to evaluate anthrax vaccination and its association with arthritic, immunological and gastrointestinal adverse reactions based upon analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database.

Methodology: We analyzed the VAERS database from 15 December 1997 to 12 April 2000. We also compared the incidence of anthrax adverse reactions with the incidence of adverse reactions reported to VAERS after adult tetanus vaccination.

Results: Anthrax vaccine was one of the most reactogenic vaccines included in VAERS. The incidence of adverse reactions reported following anthrax vaccine was higher for every reaction analyzed in comparison to the adult vaccine control groups.

Conclusions: The current anthrax vaccine may be acceptable in military populations in impending threat of anthrax exposure, the cost-benefits of vaccination in less high risk military populations may be more questionable. Civilian anthrax vaccination will require a less reactogenic vaccine. Civilian doctors should be aware of anthrax vaccine adverse reactions. Military and civilian doctors should also be diligent in their reporting to VAERS of cases of adverse reactions to anthrax vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Substances

LinkOut - more resources