A comparison of the acute hypotensive effects of two different doses of nifedipine
- PMID: 1514500
- DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(92)90283-2
A comparison of the acute hypotensive effects of two different doses of nifedipine
Abstract
To determine whether a dose of 5 mg of nifedipine would be useful in the treatment of hypertensive emergencies, we compared the acute hypotensive effects of two different doses of nifedipine, 5 mg and 10 mg, in patients with severe hypertension. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, 30 consecutive black patients with diastolic blood pressure that was equal to or greater than 115 mm Hg received either a 5 mg or 10 mg nifedipine capsule and a placebo capsule, which matched that of the alternative strength. Patients were asked to bite the capsules and swallow the contents. Blood pressure response over 4 hours and adverse effects were monitored. Mean systolic blood pressure was reduced from 191.7 mm Hg (95% confidence interval 170.8 to 212.7 mm Hg) to 157.9 mm Hg (137.0 to 178.9 mm Hg) and 206.1 mm Hg (185.1 to 227.0 mm Hg) to 153.7 mm Hg (132.8 to 174.7 mm Hg) in patients who were given 5 mg and 10 mg doses of nifedipine, respectively. Mean diastolic blood pressure in the group of patients that received 5 mg doses of nifedipine decreased from 128.2 mm Hg (115.6 to 140.7 mm Hg) to 105.2 mm Hg (92.7 to 117.7 mm Hg); the corresponding values in the group that received 10 mg doses of nifedipine were 129.9 mm Hg (117.4 to 142.5 mm Hg) and 97.5 mm Hg (85.0 to 110.1 mm Hg), respectively. The minimum mean systolic blood pressures occurred 20 and 25 minutes after administration of the 5 mg and 10 mg capsules, respectively; the minimum diastolic blood pressures were reached after 20 and 30 minutes, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Similar articles
-
Efficacy and safety of sublingual nifedipine in hypertensive emergencies.Am J Med. 1985 Oct 11;79(4A):19-25. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(85)90496-6. Am J Med. 1985. PMID: 4050842 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of nifedipine GITS and hydrochlorothiazide in the management of elderly patients with stage I-III diastolic hypertension.Am J Hypertens. 1996 Jun;9(6):598-606. doi: 10.1016/0895-7061(96)00168-9. Am J Hypertens. 1996. PMID: 8783785 Clinical Trial.
-
Safety of the coadministration of carvedilol and nifedipine sustained-release in the treatment of essential hypertension.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1992;19 Suppl 1:S134-7. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199219001-00026. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1992. PMID: 1378141 Clinical Trial.
-
Treatment of hypertensive urgencies and emergencies with nifedipine.Am Heart J. 1986 May;111(5):963-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(86)90647-2. Am Heart J. 1986. PMID: 3518379 Review.
-
Hypertensive emergencies.Crit Care Clin. 2001 Apr;17(2):435-51. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0704(05)70176-7. Crit Care Clin. 2001. PMID: 11450325 Review.
Cited by
-
Calcium channel blockers versus other classes of drugs for hypertension.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 17;10(10):CD003654. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003654.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 9;1:CD003654. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003654.pub6. PMID: 34657281 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Oral drugs for hypertensive urgencies: systematic review and meta-analysis.Sao Paulo Med J. 2009 Nov;127(6):366-72. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802009000600009. Sao Paulo Med J. 2009. PMID: 20512292 Free PMC article.
-
Calcium channel blockers versus other classes of drugs for hypertension.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 9;1(1):CD003654. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003654.pub6. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35000192 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical