Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 May 19;43(10):1843-52.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.01.030.

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy

Affiliations
Free article

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy

Ariel Roguin et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. .
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) patients treated with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD).

Background: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy is associated with tachyarrhythmia and an increased risk of sudden death.

Methods: This study included 42 ARVD/C patients with ICDs (52% male, age 6 to 69 years, median 37 years) followed at our center.

Results: Mean follow-up was 42 +/- 26 months (range 4 to 135 months). Complications associated with ICD implantation included need for lead repositioning (n = 3) and system infection (n = 2). During follow-up, one patient died of a brain malignancy and one had heart transplantation. Lead replacement was required in six patients as a result of lead fracture and insulation damage (n = 4) or change in thresholds (n = 2). During this period, 33 of 42 (78%) patients received a median of 4 (range 1 to 75) appropriate ICD interventions. The median period between ICD implantation and the first firing was 9 months (range 0.1 to 66 months). The ICD firing storms were observed in five patients. Inappropriate interventions were seen in 10 patients. Predictors of appropriate firing were induction of ventricular tachycardia (VT) during electrophysiologic study (EPS) (84% vs. 44%, p = 0.024), detection of spontaneous VT (70% vs. 15%, p = 0.001), male versus female gender (91% vs. 65%, p = 0.04), and severe right ventricular dilation (39% vs. 0%, p = 0.013). Using multivariate analysis, VT induction during EPS was associated with increased risk for firing in ARVD/C patients; odds ratio 11.2 (95% confidence interval 1.23 to 101.24, p = 0.031).

Conclusions: Patients with ARVD/C have a high arrhythmia rate requiring appropriate ICD interventions. The ICD therapy appears to be well tolerated and important in the management of patients with ARVD/C.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources