Physiologic pacing: where pacing mode selection reflects the indication
- PMID: 15145847
- PMCID: PMC1768294
- DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2003.022111
Physiologic pacing: where pacing mode selection reflects the indication
Abstract
Results of recent trials suggest that in patients with left ventricular dysfunction, interventricular synchrony is possibly more important than atrioventricular synchrony. In patients with AV block and conduction system disease, alternatives to right ventricular apical pacing are therefore needed.
Comment on
-
Incidence of atrial fibrillation and thromboembolism in a randomised trial of atrial versus dual chamber pacing in 177 patients with sick sinus syndrome.Heart. 2004 Jun;90(6):661-6. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.016063. Heart. 2004. PMID: 15145874 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Connolly SJ, Kerr CR, Gent M, et al. Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1385–91. - PubMed
-
- Lamas GA, Lee KL, Sweeny MO, et al. Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus-node dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1854–62. - PubMed
-
- Lamas GA, Orav J, Stambler BS, et al. Results of the first multicentre randomized controlled trial to assess the quality-of-life benefits of DDDR versus DDD pacing. PACE 1999;22:830.
-
- Mattioli AV, Vivoli D, Mattioli G. Influence of pacing modalities on the incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients without prior atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 1998;19:282–6. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical