Physiologic pacing: where pacing mode selection reflects the indication
- PMID: 15145847
- PMCID: PMC1768294
- DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2003.022111
Physiologic pacing: where pacing mode selection reflects the indication
Abstract
Results of recent trials suggest that in patients with left ventricular dysfunction, interventricular synchrony is possibly more important than atrioventricular synchrony. In patients with AV block and conduction system disease, alternatives to right ventricular apical pacing are therefore needed.
Comment on
-
Incidence of atrial fibrillation and thromboembolism in a randomised trial of atrial versus dual chamber pacing in 177 patients with sick sinus syndrome.Heart. 2004 Jun;90(6):661-6. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.016063. Heart. 2004. PMID: 15145874 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Similar articles
-
The effects of right ventricular apical pacing on ventricular function and dyssynchrony implications for therapy.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Aug 25;54(9):764-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.006. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009. PMID: 19695453 Review.
-
The Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial: rationale, design, results, clinical implications and lessons for future trials.Card Electrophysiol Rev. 2003 Dec;7(4):468-72. doi: 10.1023/B:CEPR.0000023165.20987.b1. Card Electrophysiol Rev. 2003. PMID: 15071277 Clinical Trial.
-
[Left atrial and ventricular epicardial dual chamber pacing through a left lateral thoracotomy to treat pediatric complete atrioventricular block].Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Aug;51(8):578-83. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2013. PMID: 24225287 Chinese.
-
An update on clinical trials in pacing: is dual chamber pacing better?Curr Opin Cardiol. 2004 Jan;19(1):12-8. doi: 10.1097/00001573-200401000-00004. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2004. PMID: 14688628
-
Optimization of ventricular pacing: where should we implant the leads?J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Feb;33(2):324-6. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00597-x. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999. PMID: 9973010 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Medium-term effects of septal and apical pacing in pacemaker-dependent patients: a double-blind prospective randomized study.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014 Feb;37(2):207-14. doi: 10.1111/pace.12257. Epub 2013 Sep 2. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014. PMID: 23998710 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Connolly SJ, Kerr CR, Gent M, et al. Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1385–91. - PubMed
-
- Lamas GA, Lee KL, Sweeny MO, et al. Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus-node dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1854–62. - PubMed
-
- Lamas GA, Orav J, Stambler BS, et al. Results of the first multicentre randomized controlled trial to assess the quality-of-life benefits of DDDR versus DDD pacing. PACE 1999;22:830.
-
- Mattioli AV, Vivoli D, Mattioli G. Influence of pacing modalities on the incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients without prior atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 1998;19:282–6. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical