Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Jun;90(6):667-71.
doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.019042.

Incidence and electrophysiological characteristics of spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias in high risk coronary patients and prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator

Affiliations

Incidence and electrophysiological characteristics of spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias in high risk coronary patients and prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator

C Wolpert et al. Heart. 2004 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the incidence and electrophysiological characteristics of spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation for primary prevention.

Design: Prospective observational study.

Patients: 41 consecutive patients, who fulfilled MADIT (multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial) I criteria, except for suppressibility by procainamide, and who received a prophylactic ICD.

Interventions: Subpectoral implantation of an ICD.

Main outcome measures: Incidence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and their electrophysiological characteristics with respect to timing of the arrhythmia, tachyarrhythmia cycle length, mode of termination, and clinical relevance.

Results: During a mean (SD) follow up of 30 (21) months 18 of 41 (43.9%) patients experienced 142 appropriate ICD treatments. The mean (SD) time to first event was 9.6 (15.1) months. One patient had ventricular fibrillation (VF), 12 patients ventricular tachycardia (VT), and five both VT and VF. The mean (SD) cycle length of monomorphic VT was 306 (42) ms. Of 142 episodes, 117 (82.3%) were terminated by antitachycardia pacing and another 25 (17.6%) by ICD discharges. Cumulative survival of hypothetical death, defined as treated VT with a cycle length < 260 ms or VF, was 83.2% after one year and 78.4% after two years.

Conclusions: Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction < 35%, a history of myocardial infarction, non-sustained VT, and inducible VT/VF are at high risk of VT/VF early after implantation. Therefore, implantation of a tiered treatment defibrillator seems to be justified.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
From the same patient (top) a two lead Holter registration of a non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) and (bottom) a stored electrogram strip from the device data log with VT terminated by ventricular antitachycardia burst pacing. CL, cycle length.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Actuarial survival rates for freedom from any ventricular tachyarrhythmia (dotted line) and freedom from any ventricular fibrillation (VF)/fast VT (< 260 ms cycle length) (continuous line) Kaplan-Meier curves for the overall patient population. The actuarial survival rate for freedom from any VT/VF was 68.5% and 58.5% after 12 months and 24 months, respectively. The actuarial survival rate for freedom from fast VT/VF was 83.2% and 78.4% at one and two years’ follow up, respectively.

References

    1. Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS, et al. Improved survival with a defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. N Engl J Med 1996;335:1933–40. - PubMed
    1. Anon. The Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Investigators. A comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias. N Engl J Med 1997;337:1576–83. - PubMed
    1. Connolly SJ, Gent M, Roberts RS, et al. Canadian implantable defibrillator study (CIDS): study design and organization. Am J Cardiol 1993;72:103F–8F. - PubMed
    1. Kim SG, Hallstrom A, Love JC, et al. Comparison of clinical characteristics and frequency of implantable defibrillator use between randomized patients in the antiarrhythmics vs implantable defibrillators (AVID) trial and nonrandomized registry patients. Am J Cardiol 1997;80:454–57. - PubMed
    1. Kuck KH, Cappato R, Siebels J, et al. Randomized comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest: The cardiac arrest study Hamburg (CASH). Circulation 2000;102:748–54. - PubMed