Critical bioethics: beyond the social science critique of applied ethics
- PMID: 15146853
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2004.00385.x
Critical bioethics: beyond the social science critique of applied ethics
Abstract
This article attempts to show a way in which social science research can contribute in a meaningful and equitable way to philosophical bioethics. It builds on the social science critique of bioethics present in the work of authors such as Renee Fox, Barry Hoffmaster and Charles Bosk, proposing the characteristics of a critical bioethics that would take social science seriously. The social science critique claims that traditional philosophical bioethics gives a dominant role to idealised, rational thought, and tends to exclude social and cultural factors, relegating them to the status of irrelevancies. Another problem is they way in which bioethics assumes social reality divides down the same lines/categories as philosophical theories. Critical bioethics requires bioethicists to root their enquiries in empirical research, to challenge theories using evidence, to be reflexive and to be sceptical about the claims of other bioethicists, scientists and clinicians. The aim is to produce a rigorous normative analysis of lived moral experience.
Similar articles
-
Constructing empirical bioethics: Foucauldian reflections on the empirical turn in bioethics research.Health Care Anal. 2003 Mar;11(1):3-13. doi: 10.1023/A:1025329811812. Health Care Anal. 2003. PMID: 14510305 Review.
-
Critical Realism and Empirical Bioethics: A Methodological Exposition.Health Care Anal. 2017 Sep;25(3):191-211. doi: 10.1007/s10728-015-0290-2. Health Care Anal. 2017. PMID: 25716752
-
Ethical boundary work: geneticization, philosophy and the social sciences.Med Health Care Philos. 2001;4(3):305-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1012075726550. Med Health Care Philos. 2001. PMID: 11760230 Review.
-
Beyond integrating social sciences: Reflecting on the place of life sciences in empirical bioethics methodologies.Med Health Care Philos. 2018 Jun;21(2):207-214. doi: 10.1007/s11019-017-9792-z. Med Health Care Philos. 2018. PMID: 28733796 Review.
-
Medical ethics research between theory and practice.Theor Med Bioeth. 1998 Jun;19(3):263-76. doi: 10.1023/a:1009965900818. Theor Med Bioeth. 1998. PMID: 9691788
Cited by
-
Monash editorial.Monash Bioeth Rev. 2015 Mar;33(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s40592-015-0028-9. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2015. PMID: 25814143 No abstract available.
-
Nanomedicine: techniques, potentials, and ethical implications.J Biomed Biotechnol. 2006;2006(5):51516. doi: 10.1155/JBB/2006/51516. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2006. PMID: 17489016 Free PMC article.
-
Adherence Tracking With Smart Watches for Shoulder Physiotherapy in Rotator Cuff Pathology: Protocol for a Longitudinal Cohort Study.JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Jul 5;9(7):e17841. doi: 10.2196/17841. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020. PMID: 32623366 Free PMC article.
-
Doing things you never imagined: Professional and ethical issues in the U.S. outpatient physical therapy setting during the COVID-19 pandemic.Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2022 Dec;62:102684. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102684. Epub 2022 Oct 29. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2022. PMID: 36356408 Free PMC article.
-
Epidemiology and bioethics: a plea for reconnecting with the public.Can J Public Health. 2011 Jan-Feb;102(1):4-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03404869. Can J Public Health. 2011. PMID: 21485959 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources