Full-body skin examinations: the patient's perspective
- PMID: 15148096
- DOI: 10.1001/archderm.140.5.530
Full-body skin examinations: the patient's perspective
Abstract
Objectives: To determine (1). primary care practitioner (PCP) and dermatologist full-body skin examination (FBSE) rates by using a patient questionnaire and (2). whether patient risk factors for skin cancer alter these rates.
Design: Questionnaires pertaining to whether participants underwent regular FBSE, their feelings about this screening test, and their risks for developing skin cancer.
Setting: The primary care and dermatology clinics at the West Haven Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
Participants: A convenience sample of 356 patients awaiting clinic appointments. Of those asked to participate, 251 (71%) agreed.
Main outcome measures: Patient report of undergoing FBSE, attitudes regarding this examination, and risk factors for cutaneous malignancy.
Results: Thirty-two percent of all respondents reported undergoing regular FBSE by their PCP, whereas 55% of those with a history of skin cancer reported undergoing FBSE. Eight percent of participants reported embarrassment with FBSE, 83% reported that their PCP would be considered thorough by performing FBSE, and 87% would like their PCP to perform FBSE regularly. Only 2% of participants would refuse the examination if the PCP were of the opposite sex, whereas 8% would be more willing to be examined.
Conclusions: Although patients report a low incidence of FBSE, those with a personal history of skin cancer are more likely to be screened. A low rate of embarrassment and a high rate of perceived PCP thoroughness are associated with FBSE. Patients have a strong preference to undergo FBSE. A sex difference between the PCP and the patient should not be a barrier to this examination.
Similar articles
-
Full-body skin examinations and the female veteran: prevalence and perspective.Arch Dermatol. 2006 Mar;142(3):312-6. doi: 10.1001/archderm.142.3.312. Arch Dermatol. 2006. PMID: 16549706
-
Predictors of skin cancer screening practice and attitudes in primary care.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 Nov;57(5):775-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.04.023. Epub 2007 Aug 31. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007. PMID: 17764780
-
Patient gender affects skin cancer screening practices and attitudes among veterans.South Med J. 2008 May;101(5):513-8. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e318167b739. South Med J. 2008. PMID: 18414179
-
Skin cancer screening in primary care: prevalence and barriers.J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999 Oct;41(4):564-6. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999. PMID: 10495376
-
Routine dermatologist-performed full-body skin examination and early melanoma detection.Arch Dermatol. 2009 Aug;145(8):873-6. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2009.137. Arch Dermatol. 2009. PMID: 19687416
Cited by
-
Identification of Incidental Skin Cancers Among Adults Referred to Dermatologists for Suspicious Skin Lesions.JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2030107. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.30107. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 33326027 Free PMC article.
-
Triple Synchronous Primary Melanomas in a 77-Year-Old Sea Captain: Importance of Total Skin Examination.Cureus. 2023 Jan 8;15(1):e33511. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33511. eCollection 2023 Jan. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 36779129 Free PMC article.
-
Ray Resection for Recurrent Invasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report.Spartan Med Res J. 2020 Oct 30;5(2):14612. doi: 10.51894/001c.14612. Spartan Med Res J. 2020. PMID: 33655188 Free PMC article.
-
Patient Perceptions of Primary Care-Based Skin Cancer Screening.JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Nov 1;153(11):1192-1193. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.2527. JAMA Dermatol. 2017. PMID: 28768305 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative and quantitative studies evaluating provider, patient, and health care system-related barriers to diagnostic skin cancer examinations.Arch Dermatol Res. 2022 May;314(4):329-340. doi: 10.1007/s00403-021-02224-z. Epub 2021 Apr 28. Arch Dermatol Res. 2022. PMID: 33913002
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical