Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 May 17;32(9):2677-84.
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh586. Print 2004.

Enhanced fidelity for rejoining radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks in the G2 phase of Chinese hamster ovary cells

Affiliations

Enhanced fidelity for rejoining radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks in the G2 phase of Chinese hamster ovary cells

Ines Krüger et al. Nucleic Acids Res. .

Abstract

The influence of cell cycle phase on the fidelity of DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair is largely unknown. We investigated the rejoining of correct and incorrect DSB ends in synchronized populations of Chinese hamster ovary cells irradiated with 80 Gy X-rays. A specialized pulsed-field gel electrophoresis assay based on quantitative Southern hybridization of individual large restriction fragments was employed to measure correct DSB rejoining by monitoring restriction fragment reconstitution. Total DSB repair, representing both correct and incorrect rejoining, was analyzed using conventional pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. We present evidence that restriction fragment reconstitution is more efficient in G2 than in G1, suggesting that DSB rejoining in G2 proceeds with higher fidelity. DNA-dependent protein kinase-deficient V3 and xrs-6 cells show impaired restriction fragment reconstitution in G1 and G2 compared with wild-type AA8 and K1 cells, demonstrating that the enhanced fidelity of DSB rejoining in G2 occurs by non- homologous end joining. Additionally, homologous recombination-deficient irs1SF and wild-type cells show identical DSB rejoining in G1 and G2. We propose that structural characteristics of G2 phase chromatin, such as the cohesion of sister chromatids in replicated chromatin, limit the mobility of radiation-induced break ends and enhance the fidelity of DSB rejoining.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
DNA histograms of unirradiated and 80 Gy irradiated CHO cells synchronized in G1 (upper three rows) and G2 (lower three rows).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Yields of DSBs as a function of radiation dose for G1 and G2 phase CHO cells as determined by Southern hybridization analysis of a 1.9 Mb restriction fragment (RF). Average induction rates are as follows (in 10–3 DSBs/Mb/Gy): AA8, G1 7.2, G2 7.8; K1, G1 6.4, G2 6.4; irs1SF, G1 7.4, G2 6.7; V3, G1 6.7, G2 6.6; xrs-6, G1 6.7, G2 6.3. Error bars represent the SEM from two or three experiments.
Figure 3
Figure 3
DSB repair in G1 and G2 phase cells as determined by conventional PFGE. (Left) Ethidium bromide images of DNA from G1 and G2 phase cells irradiated with 0, 20, 40, 60 and 80 Gy without repair or incubated for up to 24 h for repair after 80 Gy irradiation. Sc, Saccharomyces cerevisiae size standard. (Right) Time course for the percentage of initial DSBs remaining after repair. Error bars represent the SEM from two or three experiments. The data from the top two panels are redrawn in the bottom two panels in grey symbols for a direct assessment of the impact of NHEJ deficiency.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Restriction fragment reconstitution in G1 and G2 phase cells as determined by Southern hybridization analysis. (Left) Southern hybridization images of MluI-digested DNA from G1 and G2 phase cells irradiated with 0, 20, 40, 60 and 80 Gy without repair or incubated for up to 24 h for repair after 80 Gy irradiation. (Right) Time course for the percentage of initial DSBs not correctly rejoined after repair. Error bars represent the SEM from two or three experiments. The data from the top two panels are redrawn in the bottom two panels in grey symbols for a direct assessment of the impact of NHEJ deficiency.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Olive P.L. (1998) The role of DNA single- and double-strand breaks in cell killing by ionizing radiation. Radiat. Res., 150, S42–S51. - PubMed
    1. Hoeijmakers J.H. (2001) Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer. Nature, 411, 366–374. - PubMed
    1. van Gent D.C., Hoeijmakers,J.H. and Kanaar,R. (2001) Chromosomal stability and the DNA double-stranded break connection. Nature Rev. Genet., 2, 196–206. - PubMed
    1. Jeggo P.A. (1998) DNA breakage and repair. In Hall,J.C., Dunlap,J.C., Friedmann,T. and Gianelli,F. (eds), Advances in Genetics. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, Vol. 38, pp. 185–218. - PubMed
    1. Smith G.C. and Jackson,S.P. (1999) The DNA-dependent protein kinase. Genes Dev., 13, 916–934. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms