The direct closure of the internal fistula opening without advancement flap for transsphincteric fistulas-in-ano
- PMID: 15148648
- DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-0551-x
The direct closure of the internal fistula opening without advancement flap for transsphincteric fistulas-in-ano
Abstract
Purpose: The recommended closure techniques for transsphincteric fistulas demonstrate divergent results for postoperative continence and recurrence rates. An incontinence rate of 35 percent and a recurrence rate of up to 54 percent has been reported after transanal advancement techniques. The authors hypothesize that a direct closure of the internal fistula opening without tissue mobilization is easier to facilitate and generally leads to better clinical and functional results.
Methods: A prospective, observational study between 1995 and 1999 was undertaken in 90 patients with transsphincteric fistulas. A direct closure of the internal fistula opening without a flap was performed in all patients. A three-layer, nonstaggered closure of mucosa, submucosa, internal, and external anal sphincters was performed. The follow-up time periods ranged from one-half to six (median, 2.6) years and included assessment of fistula recurrence and continence using patients' histories, physical examinations, proctoscopy, and continence scores. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test or chi-squared test.
Results: Data from 90 patients with a total of 106 operations were analyzed (65 males and 41 females; average age 46 (range, 22-78) years). Sixty-six patients had previous anorectal abscess surgery, and 41 had a previous fistula operation. The mean number of previous fistula operations was 1.7. All patients were continent before surgery. Mean elapsed operative time period was 37 +/- 11 minutes, and the mean anal retraction time was 20 +/- 7 minutes. Suture line dehiscence was the main postoperative complication. It was found to occur between the fourth and tenth postoperative days in 15 patients (14 percent). In 12 of 15 patients (80 percent), the fistula persisted and operative treatment was necessary. In three patients (20 percent), spontaneous closure took place. A recurrent fistula after wound healing was observed in seven patients (6.6 percent). The risk of developing a suture line dehiscence leading to a persistent fistula or a recurrent fistula was 22.5 percent. Ninety-four percent of the patients were continent (continence score 0), 6 percent had a minimal disorder of continence (score 4). A continence level for all patients was determined by the international classification of continence disorders.
Conclusions: Direct closure for the treatment of transsphincteric fistulas is a safe and effective approach and achieves a good functional outcome; a small risk of suture line dehiscence, which may lead to a recurrent or persistent fistula, remains.
Comment in
-
Internal anal sphincter preservation with seton rerouting in high transsphincteric anal fistula.Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Aug;48(8):1666-7; author reply1667-8. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0080-2. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005. PMID: 15937616 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Repeat transanal advancement flap repair: impact on the overall healing rate of high transsphincteric fistulas and on fecal continence.Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Oct;50(10):1508-11. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9015-4. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007. PMID: 17701070 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment of transsphincteric anal fistulas: are fistula plugs an acceptable alternative?Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Apr;52(4):692-7. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819d473f. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009. PMID: 19404076
-
Successful sphincter-sparing surgery for all anal fistulas.Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Oct;50(10):1535-9. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9002-9. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007. PMID: 17674105
-
[Endorectal advancement flap-plasty vs. transperineal closure in surgical treatment of rectovaginal fistulas. A prospective long-term study of 88 patients].Chirurg. 1995 May;66(5):493-502. Chirurg. 1995. PMID: 7607012 Review. German.
-
Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract: what is the evidence in a review?World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct 28;19(40):6805-13. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i40.6805. World J Gastroenterol. 2013. PMID: 24187455 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
German S3 guidelines: anal abscess and fistula (second revised version).Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Mar;402(2):191-201. doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1563-z. Epub 2017 Mar 1. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017. PMID: 28251361
-
Repeat transanal advancement flap repair: impact on the overall healing rate of high transsphincteric fistulas and on fecal continence.Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Oct;50(10):1508-11. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9015-4. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007. PMID: 17701070 Free PMC article.
-
Complex anal fistula remains a challenge for colorectal surgeon.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 May;30(5):595-603. doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-2104-7. Epub 2015 Jan 9. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015. PMID: 25566951 Review.
-
Non-sphincter splitting fistulectomy vs conventional fistulotomy for high trans-sphincteric fistula-in-ano: a prospective functional and manometric study.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 Sep;22(9):1097-102. doi: 10.1007/s00384-007-0288-9. Epub 2007 Feb 10. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007. PMID: 17294195
-
Does laser fistuloplasty (FiLaC™) offer any benefit over surgical closure of the internal orifice?Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Jun;21(6):489-490. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1626-8. Epub 2017 May 22. Tech Coloproctol. 2017. PMID: 28534092 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources