Childhood asthma management and control. Analysis of the Student Lung Health Survey (SLHS) database, Canada 1996

Abstract

The objective of this study was to estimate the severity of childhood asthma in Canada, identify the effects of asthma interventions in different target groups, and to profile asthma management and control practices by geographic area, sex, age, and severity groups.

Methods: The SLHS was conducted as a stratified and multi-staged cluster survey across Canada in 1996. It included a total of 136 public, private and separate schools in nine health units (Prince Edward Island, Halifax, Sherbrooke, Kingston, Guelph, Winnipeg, Saskatoon, Edmonton, and Kelowna). The target study population was schoolchildren aged 5 to 19 years. Descriptive analyses were used to calculate the severity of childhood asthma for the different groups. Logistic regression was then employed to measure the quality of asthma intervention and control. Multivariate logistic regression was also used to compare the severity and treatment of asthma with age, sex and lifestyle, living and housing conditions. Using existing Clinical Practice Guidelines as a reference, the study also evaluated the effectiveness of interventions such as treatment, and asthmatic education.

Results: Based on the Canadian Consensus Recommendations of definition of asthma control, among all 5-19 years old students, 39.9% were well controlled, 33.8% were acceptably controlled and 26.3% were poor controlled. The rates of intermittent and mild asthma were 44.8% and 11.6% compared with moderate (15.3%) and severe (0.9%). Students with asthma reported receiving more advantaged information from a demonstration of inhaler users (OR = 7.51, 95% CI = 5.65-8.94), during a medical visits (OR = 6.33, 95% CI = 5.11-7.83), from the pamphlet/brochures (OR = 6.22, 95% CI = 5.05-7.76) or from a demonstration of the correct use of medicine (OR = 5.62, 95% CI = 4.62-6.82). More students visited a family doctor (40.3%, OR = 5.52, 95% CI = 4.95-6.64) and medical specialists (31.0%, OR = 3.69, 95% CI = 2.58-4.78) than other specialist when they had respiratory problems.

Conclusions: The results of the SLHS study demonstrated variations in the management and control of childhood asthma across Canada. The interventions and the practice guidelines for asthma control are useful for preventing and controlling asthma. These findings provide indications of interventions that are being used for the control of asthma in Canada.