Morbidity of inguinal lymphadenectomy for invasive penile carcinoma
- PMID: 15149749
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2003.12.003
Morbidity of inguinal lymphadenectomy for invasive penile carcinoma
Abstract
Objective: To determine the incidence and the consequences of complications related to modified and radical inguinal lymphadenectomy in patients with invasive penile carcinoma, defined by invasion of the corpus spongiosum or cavernosum (> or =T2).
Materials and methods: A total of 118 modified (67.0%), and 58 radical (33.0%) inguinal lymphadenectomy were performed in 88 patients between 1989 and 2000. To decrease the morbidity, radical inguinal lymphadenectomy was proposed only in patients with palpable inguinal lymph nodes, uni- or bilaterally (N1 or N2). Modified inguinal lymphadenectomy was performed bilaterally in patients with invasive penile carcinoma and non-palpable inguinal lymph nodes (N0), and unilaterally in the side without inguinal metastases in N1 patients. Complications were assessed retrospectively with a median follow-up of 46 months and classified as early (event observed during the 30 days after the procedure) or late (event present after hospitalisation or after the first months).
Results: A total of 74 complications after 176 procedures were recorded. After modified inguinal lymphadenectomy, 8 early (6.8%) and 4 late (3.4%) complications were observed. There were a total of 110 dissections with no complications and 8 dissections with 1 or 2 complications. After radical inguinal lymphadenectomy, the morbidity increased with 24 early (41.4%) and 25 late (43.1%) complications, observed in only 18 of 58 radical procedures. Leg oedema was the most common late complication, interfering with ambulation in 13 cases (22.4%).
Conclusion: Modified inguinal lymphadenectomy, with saphenous vein sparing and limited dissection offers excellent functional outcome in patients with invasive penile carcinoma and nonpalpable inguinal lymph nodes. The morbidity after radical lymphadenectomy still significant, especially in patients with multiple or bilateral superficial inguinal lymph nodes treated by pelvic and bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy.
Similar articles
-
Modified technique of radical inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma: morbidity and outcome.J Urol. 2010 Aug;184(2):546-52. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.140. Epub 2010 Jun 17. J Urol. 2010. PMID: 20620415
-
Contemporary morbidity from lymphadenectomy for penile squamous cell carcinoma: the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Experience.J Urol. 2002 Apr;167(4):1638-42. J Urol. 2002. PMID: 11912379
-
Long-term followup of penile carcinoma with high risk for lymph node invasion treated with inguinal lymphadenectomy.J Urol. 2010 Jun;183(6):2227-32. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.025. J Urol. 2010. PMID: 20399455
-
Management of the lymph nodes in penile cancer.Urology. 2010 Aug;76(2 Suppl 1):S43-57. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.03.001. Urology. 2010. PMID: 20691885 Review.
-
Lymphadenectomy in the surgical management of penile cancer.Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1075-88. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.02.021. Epub 2009 Feb 23. Eur Urol. 2009. PMID: 19264390 Review.
Cited by
-
Morbidity Following Groin Dissection in Malignancy Remains a Challenge: an Experience from North-East India.Indian J Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;12(3):561-564. doi: 10.1007/s13193-021-01388-4. Epub 2021 Jul 22. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34658586 Free PMC article.
-
[Primary penile cancer: about 11 cases and literature review].Pan Afr Med J. 2018 Sep 4;31:14. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2018.31.14.13077. eCollection 2018. Pan Afr Med J. 2018. PMID: 30918542 Free PMC article. Review. French.
-
Imaging in primary penile cancer: current status and future directions.Eur Radiol. 2010 Jan;20(1):36-47. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1521-4. Epub 2009 Aug 6. Eur Radiol. 2010. PMID: 19657656
-
[Lymph node management of cN0 penile cancer].Urologe A. 2018 Apr;57(4):435-439. doi: 10.1007/s00120-018-0598-2. Urologe A. 2018. PMID: 29470655 Review. German.
-
Feasibility, complications and oncologic results of a limited inguinal lymph node dissection in the management of penile cancer.Int Braz J Urol. 2015 May-Jun;41(3):486-95. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0304. Int Braz J Urol. 2015. PMID: 26200541 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources