Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2004 Jun 1;90(11):2067-72.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601815.

Cost study of metal stent placement vs single-dose brachytherapy in the palliative treatment of oesophageal cancer

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Cost study of metal stent placement vs single-dose brachytherapy in the palliative treatment of oesophageal cancer

S Polinder et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Self-expanding metal stent placement and single-dose brachytherapy are commonly used for the palliation of oesophageal obstruction due to inoperable oesophagogastric cancer. We randomised 209 patients to the placement of an Ultraflex stent (n=108) or single-dose brachytherapy (12 Gy, n=101). Cost comparisons included comprehensive data of hospital costs, diagnostic interventions and extramural care. We acquired detailed information on health care consumption from a case record form and from monthly home visits by a specialised nurse. The initial costs of stent placement were higher than the costs of brachytherapy (1500 euro vs 570 euro; P<0.001). Total medical costs were, however, similar (stent 11 195 euro vs brachytherapy 10 078 euro, P>0.20). Total hospital stay during follow-up was 11.5 days after stent placement vs 12.4 days after brachytherapy, which was responsible for the high intramural costs in both treatment groups (stent 6512 euro vs brachytherapy 7982 euro, P>0.20). Costs for medical procedures during follow-up were higher after stent placement (stent 249 euro vs brachytherapy 168 euro, P=0.002), while the costs of extramural care were similar (1278 euro vs 1046 euro, P>0.20). In conclusion, there are only small differences between the total medical costs of both palliative treatment modalities, despite the fact that the initial costs of stent placement are much higher than those of brachytherapy. Therefore, cost considerations should not play an important role in decision making on the appropriate palliative treatment strategy for patients with malignant dysphagia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adam A, Ellul J, Watkinson A, Tan BS, Morgan R, Sanunders M, Mason RC (1997) Palliation of inoperable oesophageal carcinoma: a prospective randomised trial of laser therapy and stent placement. Radiology 202: 344–348 - PubMed
    1. Bartelsman JF, Bruno MJ, Jensema AJ, Haringsma J, Reeders JW, Tytgat GN (2000) Palliation of patients with esophagogastric neoplasms by insertion of a covered expandable modified Gianturco-Z endoprosthesis: experiences in 153 patients. Gastrointest Endosc 51: 134–138 - PubMed
    1. Botterweck AA, Schouten LJ, Volovics A, Dorant E, van den Brandt PA (2000) Trends in incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia in ten European countries. Int J Epidemiol 29: 645–654 - PubMed
    1. Brewster AE, Davidson SE, Makin WP, Stout R, Burt PA. (1995) Intraluminal brachytherapy using the high dose rate microSelectrion in the palliation of carcinoma of the oesophagus. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 7: 102–105 - PubMed
    1. Dallal HJ, Smith GD, Grieve DC, Ghosh S, Penman ID, Palmer KR (2001) A randomized trial of thermal ablative therapy versus expandable metal stents in the palliative treatment of patients with esophageal carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 54: 549–557 - PubMed

Publication types