Clinical evaluation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance upon cervical cytologic examination in Israeli Jewish women
- PMID: 15150573
- PMCID: PMC2409480
- DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601874
Clinical evaluation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance upon cervical cytologic examination in Israeli Jewish women
Abstract
The adjusted incidence of cervical carcinoma among Israeli Jewish women is approximately 5 out of 100 000. This retrospective study sought to determine the clinical implications of finding atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) in cervical cytologic specimens in this population. Cervical cytologic examinations during January 2001-June 2003 diagnosed as AGUS were identified by a computerised database. Medical records were reviewed to determine the presence or absence of associated significant pathologic conditions of the cervix and identified 45 out of 11 800 patients (0.38%) with AGUS. AGUS was the only cytologic diagnosis in 14 patients, while 31 patients had both AGUS and an additional atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASCUS). All subjects underwent colposcopy, endocervical curettage, and cervical biopsy. A clinically significant diagnosis (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) II, CIN III, or carcinoma) was made in 24 patients (53.3%), including cancer in three (6.7%): one had microinvasive adenocarcinoma and two had microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma. Squamous carcinoma coexisting with a clinically significant lesion carried a risk of 61.3%, compared with a risk of 35.7% for AGUS alone (P=0.20). Detection of AGUS during cervical cytologic screening, especially with a coexisting ASCUS, indicates the existence of serious pathologic processes; management by cervical colposcopy, endocervical curettage, and cervical biopsy is recommended.
Similar articles
-
Clinical evaluation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jan;184(2):64-9. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.108995. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001. PMID: 11174481
-
Clinical significance of a cytologic diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance.J Reprod Med. 1999 Nov;44(11):922-8. J Reprod Med. 1999. PMID: 10589401
-
Cytologic and histologic review of atypical glandular cells (AGC) detected during cervical cytology screening.Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2003 Jul-Aug;13(4):518-21. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.2003.13182.x. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2003. PMID: 12911731
-
Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells on cervical cytology.Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Mar;107(3):701-8. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000202401.29145.68. Obstet Gynecol. 2006. PMID: 16507944 Review.
-
ASCUS and AGUS criteria. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.Acta Cytol. 1998 Jan-Feb;42(1):16-24. doi: 10.1159/000331531. Acta Cytol. 1998. PMID: 9479320 Review.
References
-
- Bar-Am A, Niv J, Yavetz H, Jaffa AJ, Peyser RM (1995) Are Israeli women in a low risk group for developing squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 74: 472–477 - PubMed
-
- Eddy GL, Strumpf KB, Wojtowycz MA, Piraino PS, Mazur MT (1997) Biopsy findings in five hundred thirty-one patients with atypical glandular cells of uncertain significance as defined by the Bethesda system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177: 1188–1195 - PubMed
-
- Ferris DG, Krumholz BA, Jester DM, Crosby JH, Hanly MG, Messing MJ (1996) Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance and adenocarcinoma in situ: summoning colposcopic expertise? J Fam Pract 43: 181–187 - PubMed
-
- Glezerman M, Piura B, Insler V (1989) Cervical cancer in Jewish women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 161: 1186–1190 - PubMed
-
- Goff BA, Atanasoff P, Brown E, Muntz HG, Bell DA, Rice LW (1992) Endocervical glandular atypia in Papanicolaou smears. Obstet Gynecol 79: 101–104 - PubMed