Intervertebral mobility in the progressive degenerative process. A radiostereometric analysis
- PMID: 15150701
- PMCID: PMC3476609
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-004-0713-5
Intervertebral mobility in the progressive degenerative process. A radiostereometric analysis
Abstract
Three separate stages have previously been defined in the progressive degenerative process. The first stage, characterized as temporary dysfunction with early degenerative findings, transforms into a second period of segmental instability evidenced by a resulting deformity. With the deformity the process has reached a late stage of definitive stabilization induced by osteoligamentary repair mechanisms. To test the validity of this three-stage hypothesis, we assessed the intervertebral mobility for the two most-distal lumbar disc levels in 18 adult patients with low back pain, disc degenerative findings and no prior spinal surgery. Each spinal segment was categorized according to grade of disc degeneration: (IA) normal disc height without dehydration; (IB) normal disc height with dehydration; (II) disc height decreased by less than 50%; (III) disc height decreased by at least 50%; and (IV) disc height obliterated. The intervertebral mobility was measured by radiostereometric analysis (RSA) and compared between the categories. With the patient changing position from supine to sitting, the mean vertical translation across the 11 discs categorized as IA was 2.0 mm. A small increase in mean vertical mobility with progressive loss of disc height through the degenerative stages IB (2.2 mm, seven discs) and II (2.6 mm, ten discs) was not significant. Further degeneration to grade III meant a significant mean reduction in vertical mobility to 0.8 mm for the eight discs in that category. No discs were classified as obliterated, category IV. The corresponding values for sagittal translations were 3.0 mm, 3.1 mm, 3.6 mm and 1.7 mm for the four disc categories found. These alterations were not statistically significant. We conclude that intervertebral mobility changes throughout the degenerative process, and a stage of stabilization begins when disc height is reduced by 50%. The segmental mobility status cannot be deduced from the radiographic, degenerative disc stage, since the inter-individual differences in mobility are pronounced for the same disc status. A fully stable situation cannot be taken for granted, even when the disc is reduced by more than 50%, considering the fact that some persisting mobility was seen for most patients in category III. A preceding stage of instability, in the clinical situation proven by a resulting deformity, was not verified in this study.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Standardized provocation of lumbar spine mobility: three methods compared by radiostereometric analysis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Apr 1;30(7):792-7. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000157477.91870.20. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005. PMID: 15803083
-
[Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2010 Apr;77(2):124-30. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2010. PMID: 20447355 Czech.
-
Lumbar disc degeneration and segmental instability: a comparison of magnetic resonance images and plain radiographs of patients with low back pain.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1994;113(6):297-301. doi: 10.1007/BF00426175. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1994. PMID: 7833204
-
Fundamentals of Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.World Neurosurg. 2022 Jan;157:264-273. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.09.066. World Neurosurg. 2022. PMID: 34929784
-
Lumbar discography: current concepts and controversies.Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2005 Apr;26(2):81-8. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2005.02.004. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2005. PMID: 15856809 Review.
Cited by
-
The Three-Step Approach for Lumbar Disk Herniation with Anatomical Insights Tailored for the Next Generation of Young Spine Surgeons.J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 18;13(12):3571. doi: 10.3390/jcm13123571. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38930100 Free PMC article.
-
Twelve-Month Follow-up of Lumbar Spine Range of Motion Following Intervertebral Disc Replacement Using Radiostereometric Analysis.SAS J. 2008 Mar 1;2(1):9-15. doi: 10.1016/SASJ-2007-0115-RR. eCollection 2008. SAS J. 2008. PMID: 25802596 Free PMC article.
-
Risk factors for recurrent lumbar disc herniation after discectomy.Int Orthop. 2019 Apr;43(4):963-967. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4201-7. Epub 2018 Oct 16. Int Orthop. 2019. PMID: 30327934
-
Parameters that effect spine biomechanics following cervical disc replacement.Eur Spine J. 2012 Jun;21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S688-99. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1816-4. Epub 2011 May 20. Eur Spine J. 2012. PMID: 21598118 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Controversies in failed back surgery syndrome.Eur Spine J. 2005 Dec;14(10):1037-8; author reply 1039. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1009-0. Epub 2005 Oct 25. Eur Spine J. 2005. PMID: 16247631 No abstract available.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical