Diabetic foot ulcer classification system for research purposes: a progress report on criteria for including patients in research studies
- PMID: 15150820
- DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.464
Diabetic foot ulcer classification system for research purposes: a progress report on criteria for including patients in research studies
Abstract
Various different systems have been proposed to classify diabetic foot ulcers, but none has gained widespread acceptance. The International Working Group of the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) developed a classification system for research purposes, which is described in this report. In this PEDIS system, all foot ulcers should be classified according to five categories: perfusion, extent/size, depth/tissue loss, infection and sensation. The methods to determine the presence and severity of these factors are described; each (sub)category is defined according to strict criteria, which are applicable worldwide. All experts involved and all members of the IWGDF reached consensus on this system, which will be validated first, before it can be formally introduced.
Copyright 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of four systems of classification of diabetic foot ulcers in Tanzania.Diabet Med. 2008 Feb;25(2):134-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02308.x. Epub 2008 Jan 19. Diabet Med. 2008. PMID: 18215177
-
Reliability and validity of the perfusion, extent, depth, infection and sensation (PEDIS) classification system and score in patients with diabetic foot ulcer.PLoS One. 2015 Apr 13;10(4):e0124739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124739. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25875097 Free PMC article.
-
Risk factors and healing impact of multidrug-resistant bacteria in diabetic foot ulcers.Diabetes Metab. 2008 Sep;34(4 Pt 1):363-9. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2008.02.005. Epub 2008 Jul 15. Diabetes Metab. 2008. PMID: 18632297
-
Validation of Wagner's classification: a literature review.Ostomy Wound Manage. 2003 Jan;49(1):54-62. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2003. PMID: 12532034 Review.
-
The foot in perspective.Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2008 May-Jun;24 Suppl 1:S110-5. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.834. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2008. PMID: 18384111 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparing the Meggitt-Wagner and the University of Texas wound classification systems for diabetic foot ulcers: inter-observer analyses.Int Wound J. 2016 Dec;13(6):1137-1141. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12429. Epub 2015 Feb 26. Int Wound J. 2016. PMID: 25720543 Free PMC article.
-
Characterisation and diagnosis of ulcers in inpatient dermatology consultation services: A multi-centre study.Int Wound J. 2019 Dec;16(6):1440-1444. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13211. Epub 2019 Sep 2. Int Wound J. 2019. PMID: 31475449 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction of outcomes in subjects with type 2 diabetes and diabetic foot ulcers in Catalonian primary care centers: a multicenter observational study.J Foot Ankle Res. 2023 Feb 28;16(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13047-023-00602-6. J Foot Ankle Res. 2023. PMID: 36849888 Free PMC article.
-
The cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of at-home infrared temperature monitoring in reducing the incidence of foot ulcer recurrence in patients with diabetes (DIATEMP): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2018 Sep 24;19(1):520. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2890-2. Trials. 2018. PMID: 30249296 Free PMC article.
-
Role of Procalcitonin as a Predictor of Clinical Outcome in Acute Diabetic Foot Infections: A Prospective Study.Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Jan-Feb;23(1):122-127. doi: 10.4103/ijem.IJEM_525_18. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2019. PMID: 31016166 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical