Conspecific sperm precedence in sister species of Drosophila with overlapping ranges
- PMID: 15154554
- DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00411.x
Conspecific sperm precedence in sister species of Drosophila with overlapping ranges
Abstract
Barriers to gene flow that act after mating but before fertilization are often overlooked in studies of reproductive isolation. Where species are sympatric, such "cryptic" isolating barriers may be important in maintaining species as distinct entities. Drosophila yakuba and its sister species D. santomea have overlapping ranges on the island of São Tomé, off the coast of West Africa. Previous studies have shown that the two species are strongly sexually isolated. However, the degree of sexual isolation observed in the laboratory cannot explain the low frequency (approximately 1%) of hybrids observed in nature. This study identifies two "cryptic" isolating barriers that may further reduce gene flow between D. yakuba and D. santomea where they are sympatric. First, noncompetitive gametic isolation has evolved between D. yakuba and D. santomea: heterospecific matings between the two species produce significantly fewer offspring than do conspecific matings. Second, conspecific sperm precedence (CSP) occurs when D. yakuba females mate with conspecific and heterospecific males. However, CSP is asymmetrical: D. santomea females do not show patterns of sperm usage consistent with CSP. Drosophila yakuba and D. santomea females also differ with respect to remating propensity after first mating with conspecific males. These results suggest that noncompetitive and competitive gametic isolating barriers may contribute to reproductive isolation between D. yakuba and D. santomea.
Similar articles
-
Sexual isolation between two sibling species with overlapping ranges: Drosophila santomea and Drosophila yakuba.Evolution. 2002 Dec;56(12):2424-34. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00168.x. Evolution. 2002. PMID: 12583583
-
Impact of experimental design on Drosophila sexual isolation studies: direct effects and comparison to field hybridization data.Evolution. 2005 Dec;59(12):2588-601. Evolution. 2005. PMID: 16526506
-
Intrinsic reproductive isolation between two sister species of Drosophila.Evolution. 2010 Apr 1;64(4):903-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00879.x. Epub 2009 Nov 5. Evolution. 2010. PMID: 19891626
-
Female remating, sperm competition and sexual selection in Drosophila.Genet Mol Res. 2002 Sep 30;1(3):178-215. Genet Mol Res. 2002. PMID: 14963827 Review.
-
Sperm fate and function in reproductive isolation in Drosophila.Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl. 2007;65:155-73. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl. 2007. PMID: 17644960 Review.
Cited by
-
Interactions with heterospecific males do not affect how female Mesocricetus hamsters respond to conspecific males.Anim Behav. 2013 Jan 1;86(1):151-156. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.10.019. Epub 2012 Nov 13. Anim Behav. 2013. PMID: 23439800 Free PMC article.
-
Cryptic gametic interactions confer both conspecific and heterospecific advantages in the Chrysochus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) hybrid zone.Genetica. 2011 May;139(5):663-76. doi: 10.1007/s10709-011-9567-z. Epub 2011 Mar 30. Genetica. 2011. PMID: 21448684
-
Intense sperm-mediated sexual conflict promotes reproductive isolation in Caenorhabditis nematodes.PLoS Biol. 2014 Jul 29;12(7):e1001915. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001915. eCollection 2014 Jul. PLoS Biol. 2014. PMID: 25072732 Free PMC article.
-
No evidence of conpopulation sperm precedence between allopatric populations of house mice.PLoS One. 2014 Oct 8;9(10):e107472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107472. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 25295521 Free PMC article.
-
Faster fertilization rate in conspecific versus heterospecific matings in house mice.Evolution. 2009 Jan;63(1):20-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00499.x. Epub 2008 Aug 26. Evolution. 2009. PMID: 18752610 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases