Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004;14(2):127-32.

Introduction of polyethylene terephthalate mesh (KoSa hochfest) for abdominal hernia repair: an animal experimental study

Affiliations
  • PMID: 15156103
Comparative Study

Introduction of polyethylene terephthalate mesh (KoSa hochfest) for abdominal hernia repair: an animal experimental study

Jürgen Zieren et al. Biomed Mater Eng. 2004.

Abstract

Background: Nowadays the surgical treatment of abdominal hernias includes the use of synthetic meshes in most cases. Due to chronic foreign body reactions, however, the most commonly used polypropylene meshes can lead to material hardening and recurrent hernias. As a proven cruciate ligament replacement polyethylene terephthalate (KoSa hochfest showed only little foreign body reactions and provided excellent clinical outcomes. In an animal trial it was therefore tested as mesh implant for hernia treatment and compared with Prolene.

Material and method: The study was carried out in 12 mini-pigs. 10 x 10 cm of the musculofascial abdominal layer was resected, the peritoneum was preserved. A 15 x 15 cm synthetic mesh was implanted in sublay-technique (either KoSa hochfest, Telos GmbH, Marburg, Germany or Prolene, Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany), mainly to test for chronic foreign body reactions. An independent pathologist tested the mesh size and foreign body reaction at 2 and 6 months, analysing the number of foreign body giant cells.

Results: No significant differences in mesh size were observed, neither between the compared groups nor with respect to the time periods. Compared to KoSa hochfest the foreign body reaction was significantly stronger in the Prolene implants, both at 2 and at 6 months (number of foreign body giant cells at 2 months: Prolene/KoSa hochfest: 2.2 +/- 0.4/0.8 +/- 0.2, at 6 months: 4.6 +/- 1.3/1.1 +/- 0.5). In contrast to KoSa hochfest, Prolene still showed significant foreign body reactions at 6 months as well as calcifications of all samples.

Conclusion: The animal trials revealed that due to its high biocompatibility and little foreign body reaction KoSa hochfest is a promising implant for the treatment of hernias.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources