Hemispatial neglect and visual search: a large scale analysis
- PMID: 15156783
- DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70120-5
Hemispatial neglect and visual search: a large scale analysis
Abstract
Visual search tasks have standardly been divided into two categories: those in which the target is detected through a serial, attention-driven search and those in which the target is detected rapidly in parallel and, apparently, without attentional processing. Several studies have examined this distinction in patients with hemispatial neglect with the clear prediction that the former, but not the latter, should be impaired. These studies, however, have proved inconclusive. We have addressed this issue in a large sample of patients with unilateral hemispheric infarcts to the left or right hemisphere. In addition to measuring the patients' performance on both types of visual search tasks, we documented the presence and severity of neglect and of visual field defects in these same individuals. Patients with brain-damage with or without accompanying neglect were impaired at searching for the contralateral target on both forms of visual search, relative to normal control subjects, although this deficit was magnified in individuals with neglect and was also exacerbated by the presence of hemianopia. This pattern was also more pronounced in individuals with right-than with left-hemisphere lesions. The findings not only clarify the contradictory neuropsychological data but also provide clear evidence for the involvement of attentional processing in all forms of visual search.
Similar articles
-
Visual search for item- and array-centered locations in patients with left middle cerebral artery stroke.Neurocase. 2005 Dec;11(6):416-26. doi: 10.1080/13554790500263511. Neurocase. 2005. PMID: 16393755 Clinical Trial.
-
The inferior temporal lobe mediates distracter-resistant visual search of patients with spatial neglect.J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 May;17(5):788-99. doi: 10.1162/0898929053747676. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005. PMID: 15904545
-
Right hemispatial ipsilesional neglect with chronic right hemisphere strokes.J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2018 May;40(4):347-356. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2017.1347606. Epub 2017 Aug 16. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2018. PMID: 28812421
-
Perceptual and premotor neglect: is there an ideal task to categorise patients?Cortex. 2004 Apr;40(2):323-8. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70127-8. Cortex. 2004. PMID: 15156790 Review.
-
[Clinical aspects and mechanisms of visual-spatial neglect].Rev Neurol (Paris). 1989;145(8-9):626-34. Rev Neurol (Paris). 1989. PMID: 2682937 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Loss of visual information in neglect: the effect of chromatic- versus luminance-contrast stimuli in a "what" task.Exp Brain Res. 2005 Jun;163(4):527-34. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-2207-4. Epub 2005 Jan 15. Exp Brain Res. 2005. PMID: 15654582
-
Visual hemispatial neglect, re-assessed.J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2008 Mar;14(2):243-56. doi: 10.1017/S1355617708080284. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2008. PMID: 18282322 Free PMC article.
-
Magnitude of sex differences in visual search varies with target eccentricity.Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Feb;28(1):178-188. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01796-7. Psychon Bull Rev. 2021. PMID: 32875533
-
Near and far space: Understanding the neural mechanisms of spatial attention.Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Feb;34(2):356-66. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21433. Epub 2011 Oct 31. Hum Brain Mapp. 2013. PMID: 22042759 Free PMC article.
-
Visual search in spatial neglect studied with a preview paradigm.Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Apr 18;6:93. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00093. eCollection 2012. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012. PMID: 22529795 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources