Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Jun;11(6):379-85.
doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2004.00820.x.

Rectosigmoidal bladder utilizing intussuscepted ileal segment: a surgical technique for urinary diversion and experiences in 30 patients

Affiliations
Free article

Rectosigmoidal bladder utilizing intussuscepted ileal segment: a surgical technique for urinary diversion and experiences in 30 patients

Chikara Ohyama et al. Int J Urol. 2004 Jun.
Free article

Abstract

Background: We previously reported that the ileocecal rectal bladder consists of interposition of an intussuscepted ileocecal segment between the ureters and the rectum for those in whom the urethra is not available. Although the ileocecal rectal bladder has been well accepted by most patients, it requires an extensive preparation along the ascending colon. We present a modified operation technique (rectosigmoidal bladder) by using the ileal segment alone as an interposing antireflux component and by using the sigmoidal segment to augment the rectal capacity.

Methods: From February 1993 to July 2002, 30 patients with a median age of 64 years underwent construction of a rectosigmoidal bladder. Median follow-up period was 26 months (range, 13-125). The follow up was carried out using clinical and functional assessments such as evacuation status, serum chemistry and radiographic evaluation of the upper urinary tracts and rectosigmoidal pouch. To assess the postoperative health-related quality of life, we carried out a survey comparison of the ileocecal rectal bladder patients and the rectosigmoidal bladder patients.

Results: No operative or urinary diversion-related postoperative mortality was encountered. All rectosigmoidal bladders had sufficient capacity, with no evidence of urinary reflux or daytime incontinence. When compared with our previous procedure, the ileocecal rectal bladder, the present procedure had advantages with respect to complications with urine-fecal leak and acidosis. There were no differences in mean operation time, or in the health-related quality of life survey, between the two procedures.

Conclusions: Our experience showed that this technique should be considered for those in whom the urethra is not available.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources