Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Aug;30(8):1681-4.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2332-3. Epub 2004 May 25.

Catheter-related infection in critically ill patients

Affiliations

Catheter-related infection in critically ill patients

Leonardo Lorente et al. Intensive Care Med. 2004 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To describe the incidence of the catheter-related local infection (CRLI) and catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) of central venous catheters (CVCs) and arterial catheters (ACs).

Design: Prospective, observational study.

Setting: A 24-bed medical-surgical intensive care unit of a 650-bed university hospital.

Patients: We included 988 consecutive patients admitted to the ICU during 18 months.

Measurements: The incidence density of CRLI and CRBSI, per 1000 catheter-days, of CVC and AC.

Results: Central venous catheters had a significantly higher incidence density of CRLI (4.74 vs 0.97/1,000 catheter-days; p<0.001) than ACs. Femoral venous access had a higher incidence density of CRLI than subclavian (13.15 vs 1.81/1,000 catheter-days, p=0.003) and than peripheral access (13.15 vs 2.30/1,000 catheter-days, p<0.001). Jugular venous access had a higher incidence density of CRLI (6.29 vs 1.81/1,000 catheter-days, p<0.001) than subclavian access. We found no significant differences in the incidence density of CRLI and CRBSI between the different AC accesses.

Conclusions: In the CDC guidelines, catheter insertion at the subclavian site is recommended in preference to femoral and jugular accesses, and there is no recommendation about AC site insertion. Our data support these recommendations about CVCs. Because the AC infection rate was very low, our study suggests that the access site is probably not of major importance for this type of catheter.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2002 Aug 9;51(RR-10):1-29 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Nov;28(11):2520-5 - PubMed
    1. Am J Infect Control. 1998 Oct;26(5):522-33 - PubMed
    1. Arch Intern Med. 1987 May;147(5):873-7 - PubMed
    1. Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Mar 15;36(6):743-8 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources