Optimal management of the morbidly obese patient. SAGES appropriateness conference statement
- PMID: 15162240
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-8132-6
Optimal management of the morbidly obese patient. SAGES appropriateness conference statement
Abstract
Background: Obesity is a growing health problem that contributes to numerous life-threatening or disabling disorders, including coronary artery disease, hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, degenerative joint disease, and obstructive sleep apnea. Significant weight reduction in the morbidly obese improves or reverses associated illness and benefits well-being. The purpose of the SAGES Appropriateness Conference was to summarize the state of the art for open and laparoscopic operations for the morbidly obese.
Methods: The English literature comparing bariatric procedures was reviewed and grouped by level of evidence by three surgeons (BS, LV, and CC). From more than 1,500 articles, all conference participants were provided with reprints and table summaries of no less than 50 selected manuscripts. Ten experts were requested to present reviews and make evidence-based arguments for and against the open and laparoscopic approaches in written format. An expert panel of six surgeons, including an ethicist and patient, commented on implications of data presented. The finalized statement was e-mailed to all participants for approval and comment.
Results: Consensus statements were achieved on various aspects of morbid obesity, including indications for surgery, resolution of comorbid illnesses with significant weight loss, and the importance of committed bariatric program. Our panel of experts agreed, in general, to the advantages of laparoscopic approaches compared to open operations in skilled hands.
Conclusions: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) affords improved short-term recovery compared to open gastric bypass. Laparoscopic adjustable banding can be performed with lower average mortality than either RYGB or any of the malabsorptive operations, and it produces variable degrees of short-term weight loss. Prospective randomized trials are needed to compare gastric bypass, malabsorptive, and restrictive procedures.
Similar articles
-
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy achieve comparable weight loss at 1 year.Am Surg. 2012 Dec;78(12):1325-8. Am Surg. 2012. PMID: 23265120
-
Conversion of failed gastric banding into four different bariatric procedures.Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012 Jul-Aug;8(4):400-7. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.06.009. Epub 2011 Jun 30. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012. PMID: 21937286
-
Evidence-based medicine: open and laparoscopic bariatric surgery.Surg Endosc. 2002 May;16(5):736-44. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-8239-y. Epub 2002 Jan 4. Surg Endosc. 2002. PMID: 11997813 Review.
-
Laparoscopic conversion of failed vertical banded gastroplasty to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or biliopancreatic diversion.Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Sep-Oct;11(5):1085-91. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.01.026. Epub 2015 Feb 11. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015. PMID: 25862185
-
The state of the art in bariatric surgery for weight loss in the morbidly obese patient.Clin Plast Surg. 2004 Oct;31(4):591-600, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2004.03.016. Clin Plast Surg. 2004. PMID: 15363912 Review.
Cited by
-
Obesity surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).Surg Endosc. 2005 Feb;19(2):200-21. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-9194-1. Epub 2004 Dec 2. Surg Endosc. 2005. PMID: 15580436
-
Interdisciplinary European guidelines for surgery for severe (morbid) obesity.Obes Surg. 2007 Feb;17(2):260-70. doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9025-2. Obes Surg. 2007. PMID: 17476884 No abstract available.
-
Laparoscopic gastric bypass performed with the Da Vinci Intuitive Robotic System: preliminary experience.Surg Endosc. 2006 Dec;20(12):1851-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-9146-9. Surg Endosc. 2006. PMID: 17063303
-
Laparoscopic bariatric surgery.Surg Endosc. 2006 Apr;20 Suppl 2:S450-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-0055-y. Epub 2006 Mar 16. Surg Endosc. 2006. PMID: 16544059 Review.
-
Revisional vs. primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass--a case-matched analysis: less weight loss in revisions.Obes Surg. 2010 Dec;20(12):1627-32. doi: 10.1007/s11695-010-0214-z. Obes Surg. 2010. PMID: 20577830
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials