Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry
- PMID: 15164062
- DOI: 10.1038/nature02584
Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry
Abstract
A question of long-standing interest to philosophers, psychologists and neuroscientists is how the brain selects which signals enter consciousness. Binocular rivalry and attention both involve selection of visual stimuli, but affect perception quite differently. During binocular rivalry, awareness alternates between two different stimuli presented to the two eyes. In contrast, attending to one of two different stimuli impairs discrimination of the ignored stimulus, but without causing it to disappear from consciousness. Here we show that despite this difference, attention and rivalry rely on shared object-based selection mechanisms. We cued attention to one of two superimposed transparent surfaces and then deleted the image of one surface from each eye, resulting in rivalry. Observers usually reported seeing only the cued surface. They were also less accurate in judging unpredictable changes in the features of the uncued surface. Our design ensured that selection of the cued surface could not have resulted from spatial, ocular or feature-based mechanisms. Rather, attention was drawn to one surface, and this caused the other surface to be perceptually suppressed during rivalry. These results raise the question of how object representations compete during these two forms of perceptual selection, even as the features of those objects change unpredictably over time.
Similar articles
-
Interacting competitive selection in attention and binocular rivalry.Prog Brain Res. 2005;149:227-34. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(05)49016-0. Prog Brain Res. 2005. PMID: 16226587 Review.
-
Inter-ocular transfer of stimulus cueing in dominance selection at the onset of binocular rivalry.Vision Res. 2007 Apr;47(9):1142-4. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.01.016. Epub 2007 Mar 13. Vision Res. 2007. PMID: 17360017
-
A fresh look at interocular grouping during binocular rivalry.Vision Res. 2004 May;44(10):983-91. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.12.007. Vision Res. 2004. PMID: 15031091
-
Distance in feature space determines exclusivity in visual rivalry.Vision Res. 2007 Dec;47(26):3269-75. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.09.005. Epub 2007 Oct 22. Vision Res. 2007. PMID: 17950397 Clinical Trial.
-
How does binocular rivalry emerge from cortical mechanisms of 3-D vision?Vision Res. 2008 Sep;48(21):2232-50. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.06.024. Epub 2008 Aug 13. Vision Res. 2008. PMID: 18640145 Review.
Cited by
-
Predictive Context Influences Perceptual Selection during Binocular Rivalry.Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Dec 15;5:166. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00166. eCollection 2011. Front Hum Neurosci. 2011. PMID: 22180741 Free PMC article.
-
Bistable Perception Is Biased by Search Items but Not by Search Priming.Iperception. 2018 Dec 11;9(6):2041669518812485. doi: 10.1177/2041669518812485. eCollection 2018 Nov-Dec. Iperception. 2018. PMID: 30559956 Free PMC article.
-
Attentional modulation of visual responses by flexible input gain.J Neurophysiol. 2009 Apr;101(4):2089-106. doi: 10.1152/jn.90654.2008. Epub 2009 Feb 4. J Neurophysiol. 2009. PMID: 19193776 Free PMC article.
-
fMRI correlates of object-based attentional facilitation vs. suppression of irrelevant stimuli, dependent on global grouping and endogenous cueing.Front Integr Neurosci. 2014 Feb 10;8:12. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2014.00012. eCollection 2014. Front Integr Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 24574982 Free PMC article.
-
Both a Gauge and a Filter: Cognitive Modulations of Pupil Size.Front Neurol. 2019 Jan 22;9:1190. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01190. eCollection 2018. Front Neurol. 2019. PMID: 30723454 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources