Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 May 28:5:15.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-5-15.

Prevalence of facet joint pain in chronic spinal pain of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar regions

Laxmaiah Manchikanti  1 , Mark V Boswell, Vijay Singh, Vidyasagar Pampati, Kim S Damron, Carla D Beyer
Affiliations

Prevalence of facet joint pain in chronic spinal pain of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar regions

Laxmaiah Manchikanti et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Facet joints are a clinically important source of chronic cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine pain. The purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate the prevalence of facet joint pain by spinal region in patients with chronic spine pain referred to an interventional pain management practice.

Methods: Five hundred consecutive patients with chronic, non-specific spine pain were evaluated. The prevalence of facet joint pain was determined using controlled comparative local anesthetic blocks (1% lidocaine or 1% lidocaine followed by 0.25% bupivacaine), in accordance with the criteria established by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP). The study was performed in the United States in a non-university based ambulatory interventional pain management setting.

Results: The prevalence of facet joint pain in patients with chronic cervical spine pain was 55% 5(95% CI, 49%-61%), with thoracic spine pain was 42% (95% CI, 30%-53%), and in with lumbar spine pain was 31% (95% CI, 27%-36%). The false-positive rate with single blocks with lidocaine was 63% (95% CI, 54%-72%) in the cervical spine, 55% (95% CI, 39%-78%) in the thoracic spine, and 27% (95% CI, 22%-32%) in the lumbar spine.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that in an interventional pain management setting, facet joints are clinically important spinal pain generators in a significant proportion of patients with chronic spinal pain. Because these patients typically have failed conservative management, including physical therapy, chiropractic treatment and analgesics, they may benefit from specific interventions designed to manage facet joint pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Lawrence RC, Helmick CG, Arnett FC. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and selected musculoskeletal disorders in the United States. Arthritis Rheum. 1998;41:778–799. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199805)41:5<778::AID-ART4>3.0.CO;2-V. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Manchikanti L, Staats PS, Singh V, Schultz DM, Vilims BD, Jasper JF, Kloth DS, Trescot AM, Hansen HC, Falasca TD, Racz GB, Deer T, Burton AW, Helm S, Lou L, Bakhit CE, Dunbar EE, Atluri SL, Calodney AK, Hassenbusch S, Feler CA. Evidence-based practice guidelines for interventional techniques in the management of chronic spinal pain. Pain Physician. 2003;6:3–80. http://www.asipp.org/documents/Guidelines%202003.pdf - PubMed
    1. Linton SJ, Hellsing AL, Hallden K. A population based study of spinal pain among 35–45-year old individuals. Spine. 1998;23:1457–1463. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199807010-00006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Manchikanti L, Pampati V. Research designs in interventional pain management: Is randomization superior, desirable or essential? Pain Physician. 2002;5:275–284. http://www.asipp.org/Journal/JULY-2002/Vol-5-3-page275.htm - PubMed
    1. Deyo RA, Weinstein JN. Low back pain. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:363–370. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200102013440508. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms