Can endobronchial biopsy analysis be recommended to discriminate between asthma and COPD in routine practice?

Abstract

Background: International guidelines stress the importance of accurately discriminating between asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although characteristic pathological features have been described for both conditions, their discriminatory power has never been systematically assessed.

Methods: Endobronchial biopsy (EBB) specimens from patients with a clear clinical diagnosis of asthma and COPD (50 per group) were examined by three pathologists in a double blind manner. They were asked to propose a pathological diagnosis of either asthma or COPD and to analyse qualitatively the most frequent abnormalities reported in the literature.

Results: The sensitivity and specificity of EBB ranged from 36% to 48% and from 56% to 79%, respectively. Eosinophils strongly biased the pathological diagnoses in favour of asthma, whereas their estimated prevalence was similar (11-37% in asthma and 13-41% in COPD). Metaplasia (11-39% in COPD, 1-18% in asthma) and epithelial inflammation (28-61% in COPD, 11-38% in asthma) tended to be specific to COPD, whereas epithelial desquamation (80-98% in asthma, 61-88% in COPD) and basement membrane thickening (71-94% in asthma, 53-88% in COPD) tended to be associated with asthma. There was acceptable intra- and inter-observer agreement only for metaplasia and epithelial eosinophils.

Conclusions: Specific histopathological features of asthma and COPD probably exist, but current routine analysis procedures to assess EBB specimens are not sufficiently discriminatory. This might be rectified by improving pathological definitions.