Separate grafts or en bloc anastomosis for arch vessels reimplantation to the aortic arch
- PMID: 15172258
- DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.10.094
Separate grafts or en bloc anastomosis for arch vessels reimplantation to the aortic arch
Abstract
Background: This study compares the results of the separated graft technique and the en bloc technique as a method of arch vessels reimplantation during surgery of the aortic arch and determines the predictive risk factors associated with hospital mortality and adverse neurologic outcome during aortic arch repair.
Methods: Between October 1995 and March 2002, 352 patients (mean age 64.9 +/- 11.3 years; urgent status: 49/352 [13.9%]) underwent surgery of the aortic arch using the separated graft technique (group A: n = 230 [65.3%]) and the en bloc technique (group B: n = 122 [34.7%]) to reimplant the arch vessels. An aortic arch replacement was performed in 32 patients (9.1%), an ascending aorta and arch replacement in 222 patients (53.1%), an aortic arch and descending aorta replacement in 16 patients (4.5%), and a complete replacement of the thoracic aorta in 82 patients (23.3%). Brain protection was achieved by means of antegrade selective cerebral perfusion in all patients. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 204.8 +/- 61.9 minutes (group A: 199.7 +/- 57.0 minutes; group B: 214.5 +/- 69.4 minutes; p = 0.033), the mean myocardial ischemic time was 121.5 +/- 43.2 minutes (group A: 116.7 +/- 38.9 minutes; group B: 130.80 +/- 49.4 minutes; p = 0.003), and the mean antegrade selective cerebral perfusion time was 84.5 +/- 36.4 (group A: separated graft technique 91.3 +/- 36.3 minutes; group B: 70.6 +/- 32.7 minutes; p = 0.000).
Results: Overall hospital mortality was 6.8% (group A: 6.5%; group B: 7.4%; p = not significant [NS]). The permanent neurologic dysfunction rate was 3.5% (group A: 4.0%; group B: 2.5%; p = NS). The transient neurologic dysfunction rate was 5.4% (group A: 5.5%; group B: 5.2%, p = NS). Postoperative systemic morbidity was similar in the two groups. A logistic regression analysis revealed preoperative cardiac tamponade (p = 0.011; odds ratio [OR] = 5.9) and cardiopulmonary bypass time (p = 0.010; OR = 1.01/min) to be independent predictors of hospital mortality. None of the analyzed preoperative variables were associated with an increased risk of permanent neurologic dysfunction. Age more than 70 years old (p = 0.029, OR = 5.7), myocardial revascularization (p = 0.001, OR = 2.9), and pump time (p = 0.013, OR = 1.01/min) were indicated as independent predictors of transient neurologic dysfunction by logistic regression.
Conclusions: Antegrade selective cerebral perfusion was confirmed to be a safe method of cerebral protection allowing complex aortic arch operations to be performed with acceptable results in terms of hospital mortality and neurologic outcome. The separated graft technique had no adverse impact on hospital mortality and morbidity.
Similar articles
-
Antegrade selective cerebral perfusion during operations on the thoracic aorta: factors influencing survival and neurologic outcome in 413 patients.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Dec;124(6):1080-6. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2002.124994. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002. PMID: 12447172
-
Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest and antegrade selective cerebral perfusion during ascending aorta-hemiarch replacement: a retrospective comparative study.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Apr;125(4):849-54. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2003.8. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003. PMID: 12698148
-
Hypothermic circulatory arrest is not a risk factor for neurologic morbidity in aortic surgery: a propensity score analysis.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Sep;130(3):712-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.03.043. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005. PMID: 16153918
-
Staged repair of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms using the elephant trunk technique: a consecutive series of 215 first stage and 120 complete repairs.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Sep;34(3):605-14; discussion 614-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.04.045. Epub 2008 Jun 13. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008. PMID: 18555692 Review.
-
What is the best method for brain protection in surgery of the aortic arch? Selective antegrade cerebral perfusion.Cardiol Clin. 2010 May;28(2):389-401. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2010.01.014. Cardiol Clin. 2010. PMID: 20452558 Review.
Cited by
-
Frozen elephant trunk with modified en bloc arch reconstruction and left subclavian transposition for chronic type A dissection.J Thorac Dis. 2018 Sep;10(9):5376-5383. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.08.140. J Thorac Dis. 2018. PMID: 30416785 Free PMC article.
-
[Brachiocephalic artery-sparing aortic arch repair combined with stent-graft elephant trunk technique for Stanford type A aortic dissection: analysis of 23 cases].Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2017 Jan 20;37(1):102-106. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4254.2017.01.19. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2017. PMID: 28109108 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Open repair of type Ia endoleak in the aortic arch: three tailored approaches.J Thorac Dis. 2018 Nov;10(11):6261-6265. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.10.21. J Thorac Dis. 2018. PMID: 30622799 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Normothermic frozen elephant trunk: our experience and literature review.Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2022 Jun;12(3):262-271. doi: 10.21037/cdt-22-73. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2022. PMID: 35800357 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prognostic factors for permanent neurological dysfunction after total aortic arch replacement with regional cerebral oxygen saturation monitoring.Brain Behav. 2019 Jul;9(7):e01309. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1309. Epub 2019 May 29. Brain Behav. 2019. PMID: 31144479 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous