Changes in the utilization of prenatal diagnosis
- PMID: 15172861
- DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000127008.14792.14
Changes in the utilization of prenatal diagnosis
Abstract
Objective: The impact of prenatal screening for Down syndrome has largely been assessed under the assumption that screening protocols and policies are fully used. To measure the overall effectiveness in actual clinical practice, we analyzed the tests performed by a single cytogenetics laboratory.
Methods: We reviewed all amniotic fluid and chorionic villus samples (CVS) processed by the University of Connecticut Health Center's cytogenetics laboratory for the years 1991 to 2002. We evaluated trends in the use of prenatal testing, referral indications, and the numbers of cytogenetic abnormalities identified.
Results: The number of women receiving amniocentesis or CVS declined more than 50% from 1,988 in 1991 to 933 in 2002 (P <.001), despite an increase in the number of women of advanced maternal age in the population served. There was a 68% decline in the number of women who underwent invasive prenatal testing solely on the basis of their age (1,314 in 1991 to 423 in 2002, P <.001). The number of Down syndrome fetuses detected prenatally increased from 20 to 31 (P =.08), representing approximately one half of the affected pregnancies present in the population served. Between 1991 and 2002, the proportion of antenatal cytogenetic tests with a significant chromosomal abnormality increased from 1 in 43 (2.3%) to 1 in 14 (7.0%; P <.001).
Conclusion: Advances in maternal serum screening and second-trimester ultrasonography have resulted in more judicious use of amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling.
Level of evidence: II-2
Similar articles
-
Trends in prenatal screening and diagnostic testing among women referred for advanced maternal age.Prenat Diagn. 2010 Mar;30(3):198-206. doi: 10.1002/pd.2434. Prenat Diagn. 2010. PMID: 20063323
-
Prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis in Spain: analysis and evaluation of the results obtained from amniotic fluid samples during the last decade.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Aug;157(2):156-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.03.016. Epub 2011 Apr 13. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011. PMID: 21492994
-
Prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis study of 2782 cases of high-risk pregnant women.Chin Med J (Engl). 2010 Feb 20;123(4):423-30. Chin Med J (Engl). 2010. PMID: 20193481
-
[Results of prenatal cytogenetic screening at the Prenatal Genetic Center of the Postgraduate Medical University between 1980-1990].Orv Hetil. 1992 Jan 12;133(2):71-5. Orv Hetil. 1992. PMID: 1732882 Review. Hungarian.
-
Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling.West J Med. 1993 Sep;159(3):260-8. West J Med. 1993. PMID: 8236967 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Incidence of non-age-dependent chromosomal abnormalities: a population-based study on 88965 amniocenteses.Eur J Hum Genet. 2009 Jul;17(7):897-903. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.265. Epub 2009 Jan 21. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009. PMID: 19156167 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of complications of chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis.Int J Fertil Steril. 2012 Jan;5(4):241-4. Epub 2012 Mar 20. Int J Fertil Steril. 2012. PMID: 25210610 Free PMC article.
-
The utilization and choices of aneuploidy screening in a midwestern population.J Genet Couns. 2014 Oct;23(5):874-80. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9711-x. Epub 2014 Apr 29. J Genet Couns. 2014. PMID: 24777550 Free PMC article.
-
Prenatal health care beyond the obstetrics service: utilization and predictors of unscheduled care.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan;198(1):75.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.05.040. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008. PMID: 18166312 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and array comparative genomic hybridization analyses for prenatal diagnosis of cytogenomic abnormalities.Mol Cytogenet. 2014 Dec 9;7(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13039-014-0084-5. eCollection 2014. Mol Cytogenet. 2014. PMID: 25530804 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials